Artist Merger - Part II
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
erik
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: 7 Mar 2000 1:01 am
Artist Merger - Part II
John Macy,
You gave me an idea today. You know how many traditional artists were let go in recent years after only one or two albums? Well, i think combining forces would be a benefit to both singers and consumers.
Imagine two artists cut an album or EP, it could be 7 songs, 9 songs, whatever. Each singer does a song in succession, then ends the recording with a duo/duet. Kind of like a call and answer format. Not so much a challenge, but to compliment each other. Singer A does cut 1, Singer B cut 2, and so on til the final cut. I would favor 7 songs myself. It could be two males, two females, or male and female.
I guess Moe and Joe did this but they were more of a gag entertainment concept. I'm talking about serious recording.
Any opinions on this?
-
randy
- Posts: 702
- Joined: 10 Jun 1999 12:01 am
- Location: shelbyville, illinois, usa
-
erik
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: 7 Mar 2000 1:01 am
-
randy
- Posts: 702
- Joined: 10 Jun 1999 12:01 am
- Location: shelbyville, illinois, usa
eric, I've got this real bad habit of interpreting a post however it lands in my thought processes. I don't mean any harm by it but when something gets triggered in my head I think, just because it makes sense to me, it will someone else. If you look at who I put together you can sort of see how it is connected to your post.
Kinda wierd ain't it
randy<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by randy on 26 April 2000 at 07:32 PM.]</p></FONT>
Kinda wierd ain't it

randy<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by randy on 26 April 2000 at 07:32 PM.]</p></FONT>