Recommend knee levers for C6th - technical
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
David Mason
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: 6 Oct 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Cambridge, MD, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Recommend knee levers for C6th - technical
I have a single neck C6th Carter professional - yes, I bought it that way because my interest is more in writing and recording music than in playing in a bar band. I have five foot pedals and four knee levers installed. I have changed pedal 1 (4, on a doubleneck) to give me Bb's instead of B's. Jeff Lampert and some other posters recommend that you put this change on a knee lever, so that it can be combined with pedal changes. What would you recommend for the changes to be put on LKL, LKR, and RKR? I want to keep the RKL and the last four pedals standard so that I can still use tab. I could add a L vertical pedal if it seems worthy (I almost certainly will be sending her off to Carter to do the mechanics, unless there is a better alternative). Currently my LKL drops the middle G to F, the LKR drops the high E to D, the RKL is standard (C to B) and the RKR drops both A's to Ab. I have a G on top and want to keep that, and the second pedal (5 on a doubleneck) raises the top G to a Ab as well as doing the standard things. I don't think I could handle the complexity and oddity of Paul Franklin's tuning.
P.S. (I LOVE bar bands, I'm just too old and settled to DO that anymore....)
P.S. (I LOVE bar bands, I'm just too old and settled to DO that anymore....)
-
C Dixon
- Posts: 7332
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Duluth, GA USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Bobby Lee
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14863
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
I think that Buddy Emmons' C6th pretty much covers all the bases:
<center>
</center>
------------------
<small><img align=right src="http://b0b.com/b0b.gif" width="64" height="64">Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9), Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax
<center>
</center>
------------------
<small><img align=right src="http://b0b.com/b0b.gif" width="64" height="64">Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9), Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax
-
David L. Donald
- Posts: 13700
- Joined: 17 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
I have been in discussion with Crowbear about this till the phone died and he needed sleep.
Trying to find that
G to C9 C#m7b5 D9 classic passing chord thang.
I think on the BE C6 that could be
RKR w P4 or am also asleep?
(Next morning...) I think C#dim would be a correct passing chord here also. P5 for 1st inversion? But for 2nd or 3rd inversion I am at a loss still.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 12 March 2003 at 02:30 AM.]</p></FONT>
Trying to find that
G to C9 C#m7b5 D9 classic passing chord thang.
I think on the BE C6 that could be
RKR w P4 or am also asleep?
(Next morning...) I think C#dim would be a correct passing chord here also. P5 for 1st inversion? But for 2nd or 3rd inversion I am at a loss still.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 12 March 2003 at 02:30 AM.]</p></FONT>
-
Sam Minnitti
- Posts: 192
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002 1:01 am
- Location: New Rochelle, NY
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
I am in the process of contemplating additional knees for my C6 neck as well, but would like to keep it to 4 knee levers total for that neck. I have to make the decision to either raise string 3 or lower string 5 on RKR. I see Buddy does not have the string 5 whole tone drop. Comments invited
Also, can someone give examples of how they might use the ½ step raise on string 1 (pedal
as shown in Buddy’s setup.
Thanks
Also, can someone give examples of how they might use the ½ step raise on string 1 (pedal
Thanks
-
Al Marcus
- Posts: 9440
- Joined: 12 May 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
David-You are thinking! That LKL middle G to F (5thstring)is an important pull if you want to get deep into chords. Reece used that on his Bb6 tuning about 30years ago. I use it on my E6 tuning , on mine it is B to A. resolves down to the subdominant.
Your LKR E to D(2nd string) is also very good, gives the D top for your D7-9 chord and also a sus. chord.
But on that knee lever I would also put the 6th string E to D and that with the LKL would give you a full F6 Subdominant for one thing.
Reece used all these pulls to get his very modern jazz sounds.
I won't go into a full explanation of other things you can do with it for now. Going to bed...al

Your LKR E to D(2nd string) is also very good, gives the D top for your D7-9 chord and also a sus. chord.
But on that knee lever I would also put the 6th string E to D and that with the LKL would give you a full F6 Subdominant for one thing.
Reece used all these pulls to get his very modern jazz sounds.
I won't go into a full explanation of other things you can do with it for now. Going to bed...al

-
Jeff Lampert
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: 8 May 2000 12:01 am
- Location: queens, new york city
- State/Province: New York
- Country: United States
David M.,
I agree with everyone who suggests using BE's setup as sort of a 4-knee lever C6 standard. However, it should be noted that the 3rd string C->C# raise was developed in the context of having a D note on the 1st string. It provided a way to get the first string G note (and C6 chord inversion with G on top) for those players that opt to have a first string D note instead, by simply moving up 3 frets and engaging the C->C# pull. However, since you are keeping the G note on top, the C->C# pull is less useful, although any pull obviously has value. Also keep in mind that you can get the 3rd string C# note by split-tuning pedal 7 with RKL which lowers string 3 from C->B. It's clumsy, and you have to be aware of the 4th string being pulled, but the note is there. On the other hand, there is no F note available. I agree with Carl and feel that the G->F pull has tremendous use, providing an otherwise unavailable note. Another option is to lower the E to D to provide another unavailable note, but the harmonies are much less interesting with the D note than they are with the F note. With all that being said, it probably is still best to use BE's setup as a launching pad from which to figure out what else you want and what you don't need. .. Jeff
------------------
Jeff's Jazz
I agree with everyone who suggests using BE's setup as sort of a 4-knee lever C6 standard. However, it should be noted that the 3rd string C->C# raise was developed in the context of having a D note on the 1st string. It provided a way to get the first string G note (and C6 chord inversion with G on top) for those players that opt to have a first string D note instead, by simply moving up 3 frets and engaging the C->C# pull. However, since you are keeping the G note on top, the C->C# pull is less useful, although any pull obviously has value. Also keep in mind that you can get the 3rd string C# note by split-tuning pedal 7 with RKL which lowers string 3 from C->B. It's clumsy, and you have to be aware of the 4th string being pulled, but the note is there. On the other hand, there is no F note available. I agree with Carl and feel that the G->F pull has tremendous use, providing an otherwise unavailable note. Another option is to lower the E to D to provide another unavailable note, but the harmonies are much less interesting with the D note than they are with the F note. With all that being said, it probably is still best to use BE's setup as a launching pad from which to figure out what else you want and what you don't need. .. Jeff
------------------
Jeff's Jazz
-
Buck Dilly
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: 17 May 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Branchville, NJ, USA * R.I.P.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Dave-I resisted changing the hi G to a D for a while. Adding the C to C#change helps resolve that. The hi D gives so many other new options that is it is really worth trying. I like the basic Emmons changes but have recently decided adding 3 knees. Adding low E up to F rather than G down to F, either is good. I have also opted for raising the low C to D rather than lowering the E to that D. Both are useful but different. If you have only 4 knees perhaps you should consider adding a few more, as long as you are having some work done? I worked with 4 knees for 2 years before deciding on changes. I tuned up those string to the new changes to see how useful they would really be.