Going to a Single

The machines we love to hate

Moderator: Wiz Feinberg

Post Reply
John Knight
Posts: 311
Joined: 25 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: OCEAN SHORES, WA

Going to a Single

Post by John Knight »

I have reviewed many threads regarding BIAB and Cakewalk but none of these got to the point of setting yourself up to do a single. What is the consensious of which software is better, easy to program, songs already done that is shareware and just needs to be downloaded, cost.

Thanks for your input.

------------------
D 10 Thomas with 8&6
Nashville 400 and Profex II
Asleep at the Steel
Fred Murphy
Posts: 672
Joined: 8 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Indianapolis, In. USA

Post by Fred Murphy »

I think you need both. Program your song up in BIAB, then import it to Cakewalk, and make any and all changes you need to make. Volume, type and style of instruments and drums etc. I like what I program better than most of the Midis that I have downloaded. There are a few really good ones, but most are very mediocre. Large band and orchestra ones seem to be pretty good, but not most country midis that I have found. I did find one of Leann Rimes that was really good.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Fred Murphy on 22 June 2001 at 05:18 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Bobby Lee
Site Admin
Posts: 14863
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Bobby Lee »

Band In A Box can help you get your songs together real quick. If you're satisfied with what BIAB produces, it will work for performances. Most of us, though, want to tweak things a little bit.

I export MIDI tracks from BIAB and tweak them in Power Tracks Pro, an inexpensive ($29) but powerful MIDI sequencer. Once the songs are in MIDI format, you can play them with Media Player, WinAmp, or just about any sound organizer program.

One advantage of sticking with the BIAB arrangment is that you can see the arrangement and chord progression while the song is playing. This helps if you have a hard time remembering intros or if you have strange arrangements.

The biggest disadvantage of performing with BIAB is the endings. Most of their canned endings are pretty lame, IMHO.
User avatar
David Wright
Posts: 5346
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Pilot Point ,Tx USA.
Contact:

Post by David Wright »

Your right bOb Image

------------------
[url=http://david_wright1.tripod.com/]My Web Page[/url]
Sierra S-12 9&7
Peavey-2000-PX-300

User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22136
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Jack Stoner »

I'd go with the BIAB, if choosing one or the other. BIAB generates the songs. If you get deep into BIAB you can do most of what the MIDI programs like Cakewalk do, but it does take some effort.
Post Reply