Webb 614E
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
- Posts: 594
- Joined: 5 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Montgomery, Texas USA (Home of the Bears)
- Contact:
Webb 614E
Can anyone tell me about this amp? I have a chance at one for maybe around $700.00. Is that a fair price and is this a good amp? I am somewhat less than satisfied with my Session 500 (LeMay mod and all)...any info. on it would be greatly appreciated. I've not even seen the amp yet; just thought I'd check it out with you fellas first. Thanks men.
------------------
Rod's Place www.geocities.com/vibrasonic9/index.html
------------------
Rod's Place www.geocities.com/vibrasonic9/index.html
-
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 6 Jan 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Black Diamond, Alberta, Canada
-
- Posts: 802
- Joined: 28 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: peckerwood point, w. tn.
- Jay Ganz
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Out Behind The Barn
- Contact:
- Duane Dunard
- Posts: 2000
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Troy, MO. U.S.A.
Rodney,even though we are no longer a Webb dealer, I still own a 614-E and a nice used Starburst model. Certain steels just sound better through one amp, over another. My Zum comes alive with the Webb, but my Emmons seems to sound better with a Peavey Nashville-1000 or Evans SE-200. So, one is not better then another, it's a matching game we have to play with the guitar, pick-up, and amplifier. Last I heard, the "new" factory price on a 614-E was $1700.00, so the used amp for $700.00 could possibly be a very good deal, pending age and condition.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Duane Dunard on 11 May 2000 at 07:46 AM.]</p></FONT>
- Greg Cutshaw
- Posts: 6729
- Joined: 17 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: Corry, PA, USA
- Contact:
I bought a used Webb 6-14E for $450 at Atlanta, only kicker is that it did not have the original JBL speaker in it. It came with a K-130 but otherwise it was in good condition and it sounds better than anything I've ever owned. Not sure how much I'm losing soundwise not having the D-130 but the D-130's are getting hard to find so that does explain part of me getting the amp so cheap. To me the reverb is just incredible. The tone controls can be tricky to set. With the Nashville 1000 going for $695 new with full warranty I'm not sure I would buy another Webb amp before trying a Peavey 1000. I can say that the Webb has more clarity, warmth and dynamics that my Nashville 400 has but for the money the 400 is still agreat amp.
Greg
Greg
-
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 8 Nov 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Indianapolis, In. USA
I sold my Webb a little while back for $450. I wish I hadn't, but I still have a lot of amps. The reason I sold mine was that I didn't like the sound quite so well with my Emmons as I did with my Sho-Buds, but it is still a great amp. Different amps seem to go better with different brands of steels. At least to my ear, anyway.
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN, USA
- Contact:
You don't want to put a D130 or D130F in a Webb; the 225wrms will fry it in short order at high volume. The K-series JBLs will handle a little more power than the D-series speakers, but are still marginal for stage use. The best speaker for the Webb (and the one they started using as soon as it came out) is the JBL E130-4. A good second choice is the Black Widow 1501-4, which is a little darker-sounding than the JBL, but pretty close in effeciency and power-handling.
- Earnest Bovine
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Los Angeles CA USA
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN, USA
- Contact:
Earnest,
The JBL's seem to have gotten less effecient as their power handling has increased. I think this is due largely to increases in the voice coil gap and the use of stiffer cone formulas. The original D130 (not D130F) was by far the most effecient speaker JBL (and probably anyone else) ever made, but would only handle 25-30 watts. The story is that Leo Fender had JBL design the D130F to better handle the power of the Twin amp, which was blowing the factory-option D130s and causing replacement headaches. They increased the power handling to about 50 watts by increasing the voice coil gap, which improved heat dissapation (hence better power-handling) at the expense of effeciency. Over time, they've also changed paper and cone surround materials (starting with the K-series) to resist decomposition and tearing from over-excursion. Most amp designs such as the Webb have been optimized for the sound of a particular speaker, hence the use of the E130, which is just about blow-proof in that amp. The E130 is an effecient high-power speaker - just not as effecient as the lower-power versions. One of those "no free lunch" tradeoffs, I guess...
The JBL's seem to have gotten less effecient as their power handling has increased. I think this is due largely to increases in the voice coil gap and the use of stiffer cone formulas. The original D130 (not D130F) was by far the most effecient speaker JBL (and probably anyone else) ever made, but would only handle 25-30 watts. The story is that Leo Fender had JBL design the D130F to better handle the power of the Twin amp, which was blowing the factory-option D130s and causing replacement headaches. They increased the power handling to about 50 watts by increasing the voice coil gap, which improved heat dissapation (hence better power-handling) at the expense of effeciency. Over time, they've also changed paper and cone surround materials (starting with the K-series) to resist decomposition and tearing from over-excursion. Most amp designs such as the Webb have been optimized for the sound of a particular speaker, hence the use of the E130, which is just about blow-proof in that amp. The E130 is an effecient high-power speaker - just not as effecient as the lower-power versions. One of those "no free lunch" tradeoffs, I guess...
- Earnest Bovine
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Los Angeles CA USA
- Jay Ganz
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Out Behind The Barn
- Contact:
- Dennis Manuel
- Posts: 761
- Joined: 23 Jan 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Quesnel, B.C., Canada
I recently bought a Webb 614-E amp and the sound is fantastic. It has a reconed 4 ohm speaker in it so I can't really say if the original speaker sounded any different. Currently I play a Legrande lll with a 17,500 ohm hum bucker pickup and it sounds great. I have the main EQ section shut off and the other EQ section set like this.
Sensitivity +6
Volume +3 to +4
Bass +6
Mid Range +1
Treble +2.5 to +2.75
These amps are bright sounding amp so be careful with adding to much highs, you could hurt someone. Hope this helps and if you don't like it someone will definitely buy it.
Sensitivity +6
Volume +3 to +4
Bass +6
Mid Range +1
Treble +2.5 to +2.75
These amps are bright sounding amp so be careful with adding to much highs, you could hurt someone. Hope this helps and if you don't like it someone will definitely buy it.
- Bobby Lee
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14863
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
- Contact: