studio quality reverb ?

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Post Reply
User avatar
Bob Hoffnar
Posts: 9412
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Tx
Contact:

studio quality reverb ?

Post by Bob Hoffnar »

Sometimes I need to cut tracks wet for recording sessions. My boss se-70 doesn't make it. Mostly I don't record with reverb but sometimes it would come in handy.

Is the Lexicon LXP-1 good sounding enough for a real studio ? Any tonal difference between the LXP-5 and LXP-1 ?

I'm talking about dealing with real picky rock engeneers. They know there stuff when it comes to sounds.

Bob<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Bob Hoffnar on 28 January 2000 at 01:50 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Dave Boothroyd
Posts: 902
Joined: 30 Oct 1999 12:01 am
Location: Staffordshire Moorlands
Contact:

Post by Dave Boothroyd »

IMHO all the Lexicon 'verbs are studio quality, and I am picky!
The only multi effect machine that comes near them for me is the Ensoniq DP4, though there is a similar Roland which a colleague of mine swears by.
I have worked in studios since you had to drive them by steam and teach recording and Production here in the UK.
That's what I mean by picky!


------------------
Cheers!
User avatar
Earnest Bovine
Posts: 8354
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA USA

Post by Earnest Bovine »

LXP-1 has better reverbs than LXP-5. The -1 can do only delay or reverb, but the 5 can do some pitch-mod stuff (chorus). However, the 5 cannot be easily edited, and its chorus stuff is not very versatile. For example, the smallest pitch change is too wide for my taste sometimes.
So I say the 1 is a better deal. However I have had reliability problems with them, more than once, even after sending tmy second one back to Lexicon for repairs.

I woul dsuggest the Lexicaom MPX-100. I think it sounds beter than LXP-1. It has much better features (e.g. tap tempo, more knobs, etc). It is 10 years newer, after all, and you know how digital stuff has improved in 120 years. Besides, a new MPX-100 should be only about $250 (mine was $199) which is probably not much more than an old LXP-1 anyway.
John Macy
Posts: 4315
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Rockport TX/Denver CO
Contact:

Post by John Macy »

You can't go wrong with a Lexicon. They have always had the most dense and lush sound (although the new TC M3000 is pretty mind blowing, though not cheap). I own a LOT of Lexicon gear.

I would check out the new MXP500. It is a step up from the 100, adding more editing power, plus balanced +4 inputs. Another big plus is it has an internal power supply, instead of the wallwart that the 100 has. it also has a LCD display. Also, it has S/PDIF I/O, and I know you have the hard disk system, and that would be a plus. Should be in the $500 range, though I have not heard a final price.

I am going to move my MXP100 to my small rack and add the 500 to my main rack.
User avatar
Steve Feldman
Posts: 3345
Joined: 5 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Central MA USA

Post by Steve Feldman »

I just bought a Lexicon MPX-1 off of E-Bay. It's still in transit. Anyone have any thoughts on this thing?
Steve
User avatar
Bob Hoffnar
Posts: 9412
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Tx
Contact:

Post by Bob Hoffnar »

Have any of you guys checked out those 60's stand alone spring reverb units by Fender or Pemier ?

They are too big and impractical for most applications I guess. If I was a rich guy I would check out that Soldano Surf Box.

Can you thin out the late reflections and change the start time ( distance from attack) on the MPX 500 or 100 ? I don't like the pre set sounds on digital reverbs when they make my pick attack all soupy.

Bob
Post Reply