Shobud Maverick

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Brian Henry
Posts: 3003
Joined: 7 Oct 2000 12:01 am
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Shobud Maverick

Post by Brian Henry »

Take a look at this gem $1400 for a maverick!!!
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pedal-Steel-Guitar... <font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by b0b on 28 May 2006 at 10:48 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
David Doggett
Posts: 8088
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by David Doggett »

That's about twice what it's worth. The only thing unique about this Maverick is the finish. The stock finish for this model was a brown fake wood cover glued on like wallpaper - ugliest steel guitar ever made. It's possible someone stripped the cover off and refinished with natural lacquer. However, the wood looks too highly figured for that. Maybe it was custom ordered with figured maple and natural lacquer finish. Still, it's a Maverick, ugly black endplates, coat-hanger pull-release mechanism and all.
User avatar
Bobby Lee
Site Admin
Posts: 14863
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobby Lee »

But hey, it includes a seat!
User avatar
Blake Hawkins
Posts: 1848
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Florida
State/Province: Florida
Country: United States

Post by Blake Hawkins »

That's a very early stock Maverick from about 1974.
I have one very much like it. They made these before they went to the ugly plastic finish.
It is a nice piece of maple with a clear lacquer finish.
Blake
User avatar
David Doggett
Posts: 8088
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by David Doggett »

Interesting, Blake. I never knew they made any of this model natural lacquer - didn't appear in any of the catalogues or brochures. I think the best Maverick was the one before this one. They were almost all natural lacquer, had a raised wood neck that wrapped around the changer, and had a pro type keyhead with roller nuts and grovers. But underneath they were all the same, except for the very earliest ones, which were even flimsier underneath.
Bobbe Seymour
Posts: 7418
Joined: 12 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobbe Seymour »

Pretty funny, wish I could get those prices! On my floor it would be $499.00, a shame that it isn't even the "Good" early Maverick. At least the first ones sounded good.
The Carter Starter is a four times better deal, the GFI student? Yep, this also.
Ebay, ya' gotta' love it!
Pat Kelly
Posts: 469
Joined: 29 Feb 2004 1:01 am
Location: Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Pat Kelly »

Yes guys, this is overpriced but not by as much as you think. If I bought it at Bobbe's for the $499, it would still probably cost me around $AUS1200 with currency conversion, shipping and tax on arrival. Insurance if required. I'd still have to find a pack-a-seat if I wanted one and a volume pedal. Even so, this guy is a bit ambitious. I'd say, in this market, its over priced by at least 30% for an opening bid. I last saw a Maverick on e-bay in Austalia about two and a half years ago and it had an opening price of $AUS1200. It didn't attract any bids.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Pat Kelly on 27 May 2006 at 11:15 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Russ Tkac
Posts: 2486
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Russ Tkac »

Mine from 74 was also the clear finish. They went to the ugly finish shortly after that.
A. J. Schobert
Posts: 1172
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 1:01 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio,
State/Province: Ohio
Country: United States

Post by A. J. Schobert »

There is a music store close to me with a maverick for sale $799 if I buy it and flip it on ebay how much profit will I make ? hmmm.
Bobbe Seymour
Posts: 7418
Joined: 12 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobbe Seymour »

Not as much as you'd make if you bought it from me and flipped it on Ebay!

Bobbe
Ron !
Posts: 3860
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 12:01 am
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Ron ! »

Touche
A. J. Schobert
Posts: 1172
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 1:01 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio,
State/Province: Ohio
Country: United States

Post by A. J. Schobert »

this is true
User avatar
Blake Hawkins
Posts: 1848
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Florida
State/Province: Florida
Country: United States

Post by Blake Hawkins »

Dave,
You are correct. I got out my 1974 Sho-Bud catalog and the guitar shown has a raised neck.
Mine also has a raised neck.
However, my Maverick does not have a roller nut, so it may predate '74.
Blake
Joe Shelby
Posts: 306
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 1:01 am
Location: Walnut Creek, California, USA
State/Province: California
Country: United States

Post by Joe Shelby »

The Maverick (natural maple, raised neck, nut
rollers) I had delivered in May, 1974.
Within a year I installed Schaller keys (that
was a pretty complex job, that included disassembling two of the tuners and shortening the string shafts. The keyhead would not accomadate them the way it was cast). Of course Sho-Bud's answer for the same situation was to grind down the shafts on strings 5 and 6 (they were Grover Sta-Tites, not a good key).
I added two knee lever kits (from Sho-Bud);
one raised the 1st and 7th strings a half;
the other I somehow rigged to pull the E's up
a half (don't remember how I made that work).
Why did I go to all this trouble? I just couldn't afford a pro model guitar.
I gigged with it for two years, five or six nights a week and I just put up with the tuning/playability issues...I guess I was a lot more patient back then.

Joe.
Charles Davidson
Posts: 7549
Joined: 9 Jul 2005 12:01 am
Location: Phenix City Alabama, USA
State/Province: Alabama
Country: United States

Post by Charles Davidson »

Wonder how many beginners over the years gave up because of the maverick,or a Red Baron,That prestigious lable put on them could easily fool someone that has NO clue what a real guitar that will play in tune and STAY in tune is.
Charles Davidson
Posts: 7549
Joined: 9 Jul 2005 12:01 am
Location: Phenix City Alabama, USA
State/Province: Alabama
Country: United States

Post by Charles Davidson »

Joe,all that time and trouble trying to get your Maverick to play,If you could have found something like a Pro-1[even if it was beat up.]You would at least had a real guitar.
User avatar
Tony Prior
Posts: 14718
Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
Location: Charlotte NC
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Tony Prior »

the MAV.. I purchased in the early 70's was Natural finish on an all Maple body...just like the one pictured.

EBAY..gotta love it....

But it ain't the Sellers fault if someone pays $1400 for this....

I have seen some students show up for a lesson with a student Steel that they purchased from a PLAYER..that basically couldn't be played..knee levers flopping around not even connected....

Which is worse ?

t
User avatar
Scott Shipley
Posts: 1925
Joined: 22 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: The Ozark Mountains
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Scott Shipley »

Ooooooooooooo, all this Maverick hatin!
Image<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Scott Shipley on 01 June 2006 at 03:29 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Jonathan Shacklock
Posts: 681
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 1:01 am
Location: London, UK
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jonathan Shacklock »

I loved my Maverick. There, I'm out! It stayed in tune, the changes (2+2) all worked correctly (zero cabinet drop! Image ) and to my ears it sounded perfectly fine, great even, for a beginner's guitar (a 30 year old one with an 'ugly' finish at that). {edited to add: The guitar!!}

I upgraded after six months, but that was less to do with lack of quality in the guitar and more to do with being HOOKED on pedal steel. I imagine that was all they were intending when they designed it.

$1400 is ridiculous but to a lot of people a Mav (for Bobbe's $499 anyway) costs all they can scrape together for a funny looking trouser-press with strings and a brake. BTW spare a thought for Pat, have you seen how much a Carter Starter costs down under? http://www.guitarfactory.net/Folk/pedalsteel.htm

Same story over here, you pretty much pay twice the US dollar value. Let's please not talk about Pro-1's.
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Jonathan Shacklock on 01 June 2006 at 03:48 AM.]</p></FONT>
Pat Kelly
Posts: 469
Joined: 29 Feb 2004 1:01 am
Location: Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Pat Kelly »

Which all goes to illustrate what a great country this is, even for PSGs. When they come over here they never go back!