Anyone ever try Sneaky Pete's tuning............
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Russ Tkac
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Bobby Lee
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14863
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
That interview with him in Steel Guitarist Magazine #2 is really good, by the way. He also describes the gadgets and circuits he uses to get that trademark tone.
-
Tim Bridges
- Posts: 965
- Joined: 18 Oct 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Hoover, Alabama, USA
- State/Province: Alabama
- Country: United States
-
Bosse Engzell
- Posts: 373
- Joined: 13 Jan 2000 1:01 am
- Location: �ppelbo, SWEDEN
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jay Ganz
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Out Behind The Barn
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Tim Bridges
- Posts: 965
- Joined: 18 Oct 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Hoover, Alabama, USA
- State/Province: Alabama
- Country: United States
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
This is hilarious...if this link works it's to a pre-MTV video of the Burritos with Sneaky, Gram, Chris, Bernie and Mike doing "Older Guys" on a boat. You watch Pete in the background cracking up wihile standing and faking at playing his steel while Gram pretends to be Mick Jagger.....
Classic stuff.
http://20-248-e.onlinestoragesolution.com/spikepriggen/public/BurritoBrothersOlderGuys.mov
Classic stuff.
http://20-248-e.onlinestoragesolution.com/spikepriggen/public/BurritoBrothersOlderGuys.mov
-
Bosse Engzell
- Posts: 373
- Joined: 13 Jan 2000 1:01 am
- Location: �ppelbo, SWEDEN
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jim Palenscar
- Posts: 6031
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Oceanside, Calif, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
It was Sneaky's work with Jackson Browne on "For Everyman" that started me on pedal steel in the early 70's- specifically the transition from "Take It Easy" to the next song "Our Lady of the Well(?)". His phase-shifted weaving of the two songs captivated me and consequently I purchased a pedal steel (Maverick) to do that. It wasn't until I started hunting down songs that had a pedal steel in them that I realized that, at the time, it was fairly unusual to have a pedal steel in that genre and I was forced to listen to country music just to hear the steel guitar (a tough swallow for me at the time). Now I listen to country 80% of the time and have a steel guitar store. All Sneaky's fault!. If I ever get the opportunity to meet him I'll have to thank him for changing my life.
-
Russ Tkac
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Skip Edwards
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: 1 Dec 1998 1:01 am
- Location: LA,CA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Russ Tkac
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Skip,
I believe that one is just Pete. Sneaky and Ed played on the Michael Dinner album together and also on some songs together. I don't think Ed played on "For Everyman." The solo was Pete and David Lindley.
Russ<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 07 October 2005 at 01:15 PM.]</p></FONT>
I believe that one is just Pete. Sneaky and Ed played on the Michael Dinner album together and also on some songs together. I don't think Ed played on "For Everyman." The solo was Pete and David Lindley.
Russ<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 07 October 2005 at 01:15 PM.]</p></FONT>
-
Bobby Lee
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14863
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
John Poston
- Posts: 636
- Joined: 7 Apr 2004 12:01 am
- Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
chris ivey
- Posts: 12703
- Joined: 8 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: california (deceased)
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Russ Tkac
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
-
Mark Eaton
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Sonoma County in The Great State Of Northern California
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21830
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
Donny, if you get a chance to listen to some of the boots floating around, the Burritos stuff was by FAR his best! When I saw him live in the 70's he was jaw-dropping. some of his studio stuff is stellar, but much is paid-session filler.
His head/hands are the main thing, of course...but his unusual tuning and changes make for a lot of the signature sounds/licks. you can sorta duplicate them with other equipment, but they just don't sound right. As Bob Carlucci has noted, some of the pedal lowers make a huge difference in the "flow" of notes.
I use it, and find it far more useful than E9 for what I mess with. It's really sort of a universal tuning on 8 strings - like a C6 with E9-type changes, plus assorted unique changes.
And the tone is simply unique to Fenders.
His head/hands are the main thing, of course...but his unusual tuning and changes make for a lot of the signature sounds/licks. you can sorta duplicate them with other equipment, but they just don't sound right. As Bob Carlucci has noted, some of the pedal lowers make a huge difference in the "flow" of notes.
I use it, and find it far more useful than E9 for what I mess with. It's really sort of a universal tuning on 8 strings - like a C6 with E9-type changes, plus assorted unique changes.
And the tone is simply unique to Fenders.
-
Mike Perlowin RIP
- Posts: 15171
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Los Angeles CA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
After looking carefully at Pete's tuning got a while, I have to concur with b0b.
Everything is tuned to B rather than E, but most of his changes the same as the standard E9 changes. His pedals 1 and 2 are exactly the same as our A and B pedals. His pedal 3 ultimately yields the same results as the 2nd string lower. His 4th pedal is the equivalent of the E to Eb knee lever, his 5 is the same as the B to Bb change, etc.
I dare say that if he were to switch over to a 10 or 12 string with a standard E9 or universal tuning, after a period of adjustment, he's probably play exactly the same way he does now.
He sounds great because he has great technique and a fertile musical imagination. He chooses to remain with an older instrument and tuning with which he's comfortable, but it's him, not the guitar he chooses to play.
Everything is tuned to B rather than E, but most of his changes the same as the standard E9 changes. His pedals 1 and 2 are exactly the same as our A and B pedals. His pedal 3 ultimately yields the same results as the 2nd string lower. His 4th pedal is the equivalent of the E to Eb knee lever, his 5 is the same as the B to Bb change, etc.
I dare say that if he were to switch over to a 10 or 12 string with a standard E9 or universal tuning, after a period of adjustment, he's probably play exactly the same way he does now.
He sounds great because he has great technique and a fertile musical imagination. He chooses to remain with an older instrument and tuning with which he's comfortable, but it's him, not the guitar he chooses to play.
-
Russ Tkac
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
I tuned my fender 400 with six pedals to Pete's B6 and in a few minutes I felt right at home with it. It works like a B6/E9 to some degree. Third fret G chord with AB pedals... release the pedals and you have a D chord...back to frets to C. The range is much lower and thats cool and I don't break strings with the D# to E pull. I think if more E9 players sat down with his set up we would see a few more converts.
The tuning is just a tool. It is all in the mind and hands...I know... because I have his tuning and I don't sound like him! Damn!
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 25 February 2006 at 05:29 AM.]</p></FONT>
The tuning is just a tool. It is all in the mind and hands...I know... because I have his tuning and I don't sound like him! Damn!
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 25 February 2006 at 05:29 AM.]</p></FONT>-
Jim Meiring
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 26 Nov 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Highlands, North Carolina, USA
- State/Province: North Carolina
- Country: United States
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
Mike - that's the same thing I noticed, but with one slight difference - the open tuning is much more "western swing" sounding than an E9. Pete comes from that background, so the 6th tuning makes sense. It also seems to be easier to duplicate rock/blues guitar licks with that tuning than an E9 (again, thinking of it open). The other nice thing is that it has a huge low end that isn't there on the E9.
I played an E9 a few years ago for a little while and never got anywhere with it, quit, came back with another E9, dumped it and got the 400...tuned it to Sneaky's setup and the light went on instantly. Like Russ says, if more folks tried it, there would be a mess of converts.
And while the instrument is old and limited in terms of changes, those issues are irrelevant. If you settle on that setup you don't NEED a myriad of change options or chromatic strings. It is what it is - and works darned well for just about anything other than "speed country", which seems to be fine with most of us who play them. We don't need to "upgrade" since what we have works for us. Pete's a great example of that (and he had an MSA at one time...still went back to the Fender).
I played an E9 a few years ago for a little while and never got anywhere with it, quit, came back with another E9, dumped it and got the 400...tuned it to Sneaky's setup and the light went on instantly. Like Russ says, if more folks tried it, there would be a mess of converts.
And while the instrument is old and limited in terms of changes, those issues are irrelevant. If you settle on that setup you don't NEED a myriad of change options or chromatic strings. It is what it is - and works darned well for just about anything other than "speed country", which seems to be fine with most of us who play them. We don't need to "upgrade" since what we have works for us. Pete's a great example of that (and he had an MSA at one time...still went back to the Fender).
-
Jon Zimmerman
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: 25 May 2005 12:01 am
- Location: California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States

