Curt Trisko wrote:
Can artistic expression only be good if it captures a sentiment that you agree with? If people refuse to see value in things that don't align with their worldview, it's their loss. Whether you agree with the sentiment of the song doesn't change how good or bad it is. There's an art to songwriting - and capturing a sentiment is different than pandering to people.
I agree the song can be appreciated for what it is, without the musician having to subscribe to it. I enjoy playing songs about cheating on my wife, coming home drunk, punching my boss and quitting, and robbing trains - none of which I actually do nor endorse. And I think that's part of the appeal of our music - it may not reflect MY life, but most of those songs exist because for SOMEBODY, that's the way it was or still is.
If I were to be offended by every song which tells of things I don't agree with, there probably would not be too many left for me to listen to. Scratch "Whiskey Bent And Hell Bound". I don't rely on booze to cope so forget about "Tonight The Bottle Let Me Down" and "There Stands The Glass". "I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die" - man, that's sure not anything I approve of, forget Folsom Prison Blues. I'm not a church-goer, so should I never listen to "Amazing Grace" or "Will The Circle Be Unbroken"?
So many more, but you get the idea. Again, what anybody likes or doesn't like is none of my concern. But I would have a difficult time if someone asked
me not to listen to a given song because
they didn't like the words.
Many play better than I do. Nobody has more fun.