It's a push pull, and it doesn't look like it needs a rebuild to me, just tune it up (follow the instructions on the sticky at the top of this section) and see what happens.
If everything is still original, then it shouldn't be too far out of whack.
Please Note: These serial numbers apply to D-10's only. After each number, the letter "D" is stamped. Great care has been taken to verify the accuracy of this information with various "Push-Pull Experts" around the U.S. However, we cannot guarantee the information given in the above chart is 100% accurate.
In the years 1964 and 1965, it appears that serial numbers were taken off of the sales invoice; and that these guitars were not consecutively numbered (as they may have used an invoice or 2 in between guitar sales for pickup sales or string sales, etc.)
Also, at a certain point, it is possible that the endplates were serialized ahead of guitar construction and put on a shelf, and then taken down and assembled into a guitar at a later date. Therefore, it is possible that some numbers may fall into one year earlier or later than shown on the chart.
Yeah, it's laq. As far as it's value, I'd suggest doing a search on the For Sale section of the Forum and see what they've sold for.
You might also ask Lynn Stafford, Billy Knowles, or Mike Cass.
I'd say between $3000 and $3500. Can't tell too much about the finish, as it's so dusty and dirty, so that may affect the value. I've seen them go for more or less, it just depends on who's looking to buy at the time.
the only thing I would add is you cannot tell what it needs work wise from a photo , you need to literally be in front of it and evaluate it.
This SD10 looks awesome in the photo, but in reality it had a frozen changer (hardened grease) and was unplayable, it required a total rebuild , THEN it became a great player.
Last edited by Tony Prior on 9 Aug 2016 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders , Eastman Mandolin ,
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years
I will get better pics of it. I will sell it and know nothing about pedal steel guitars. And am getting info. I do believe the finish is original. I have an early picture of original owner John Rhoton playing this guitar in this finish. I understand you guys refinish them anyway. A real no no for other types of guitars. It also has seven knee levers with at least one I think where two work in tandem. I am in Central Illinois for anyone wanting to see it first hand.
I had a D-10 in almost the exact same finish, and have seen one of the Mandrell sisters playing one like that too, so I would think it's the original finish.
A couple D-10s,some vintage guitars & amps, & lotsa junk in the gig bag.
The turnbuckle is probably to keep the cabinet from bowing outwards in the center, which is why Emmons used the flat bar across their cabinets for years.
The turnbuckle gives me pause, however; the guitar has been "messed with" to some extent, obviously. Whether done "correctly" or not is not that clear from the photos.
It does has a lot of levers, but needs (IMHO ) a deep cleaning and lubrication, if not a complete tear-down and reassembly for it to be "worth" $3000 or over... to me, of course. But I've owned many Emmonses (still do) and I'm particular about condition. And I like working on them. YMMV.
I'd say this is an early 70's guitar.
My rig: Infinity and Telonics.
Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
Herb Steiner wrote:
The turnbuckle gives me pause, however; the guitar has been "messed with" to some extent, obviously. Whether done "correctly" or not is not that clear from the photos.
That's along the lines of the questions I was suggesting this raises. Was this to prevent bowing or to remedy it? (I think it unlikely that someone will mount this hardware 'just in case'). Is the hardware free & clear of moving parts?
It definitely calls for examination by a prospective buyer.
As Herb said, this guitar has been lets say, messed with. Now whether it's been messed with good or bad, only a closer examination would determine that. The turn buckle worries me. Don't know if it was installed because it needed it or as just a precaution to keep the cabinet from spreading as in trying to reinvent the wheel. If it needed it, something is wrong. The cross flat bar across the cabinet works perfect so don't know why the turn buckle. I would be a little leery of putting a lot of money in this guitar on a purchase. Not much over 2 G.
Henry Matthews
D-10 1974 Emmons cut tail, fat back,rosewood, 8&5
Nashville 112 amp, Fishman Loudbox Performer amp, Hilton pedal, Goodrich pedal,BJS bar, Kyser picks, Live steel Strings. No effects, doodads or stomp boxes.
Upon reflection of the last couple of posts, I'm almost certain the turnbuckle is there to remedy bowing that already has taken place, otherwise why go to the trouble to fix something that ain't broke?
I'm almost certain the turnbuckle isn't the factory recommended method of repair.
My rig: Infinity and Telonics.
Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
I dont have pics yet but did get a good look at the turnbuckle and it is there for bracing accross the guitar. It is attached to nothing else. Why it was done I dont know I see no bowing ect whatsoever.
Glen Sloan wrote:I dont have pics yet but did get a good look at the turnbuckle and it is there for bracing accross the guitar. It is attached to nothing else. Why it was done I dont know I see no bowing ect whatsoever.
That's prob'ly because there's that turnbuckle on there.
If the cabinet is now square, I wonder if putting two correct Emmons bracing bars across the front and back aprons would hold the thing enough that the turnbuckle could be removed. Since it's a fat back, it would use the straight brace bars. Easy.
My rig: Infinity and Telonics.
Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?