Limited Motivity

Charles Davidson · Post by **Charles Davidson** » 13 Apr 2010 3:19 pm

Mr. Bill goes down this road every day,[lawd,lawd] He goes down this road every day.=He goes down this road every day [LAWD,LAWD]= BUT

WHAT

DID

HE

SAY

YOU BETCHA,DYK?BC.

David Beckner · Post by **David Beckner** » 13 Apr 2010 3:34 pm

He"s a goin down the road feelin bad lawd lawd cause nobody knows what he say.

Charles Davidson · Post by **Charles Davidson** » 13 Apr 2010 4:02 pm

MR. Bill, [CRITICASTER] Kudo's that's a

GOOD one.Got to write that one down,

YOU BETCHA,DYK?BC.

Bill Hankey · Post by **Bill Hankey** » 14 Apr 2010 3:34 am

Charles,

In who's hands would you place the preservation of country music? You may think of the brilliant steel guitarist who collaborated with The Rock and Roll Band known as "Dire Straits" (Sp. close, but maybe no cigar). Nah! Not a chance! In another bracket of personality changers, it isn't difficult to find a swarm of bee-like creatures circulating, and ostensibly searching for that sweet nectar that converts into cash flow. Neither would they be suited for influencing the preservation of, Quote: "Sappy three chord country songs." It has been drilled into the heads resting on promising entities, to wit: "All good things must come to an end." It may be reasonable to think that those who go about reciting those familiar words, over and over: "Preserve for future generations", are the least likely subjects to carry the ball faithfully.
The familiar outcry, expressed in many different ways, over time, condenses into a staticky compulsion. Observe for a moment, the various accounts of treatments meted out to elder members of the Opry. "Death On Music Row", was apparently picked up by Jones, Strait, and Jackson for delivering a message that all is not well, as Nashville's hometown country music collides with opportunists. They never fail to spring up to share in the gates intake of curious waves of nonconformists paying big bucks to see for themselves the changes in country music formats. I can't believe that borrowing, and believing in those who display so much grandeur in sophisticated musical settings, will not trip on this currently venturesome approach to expanding, by investing in what may turn out to be another investment with bankers monies. Once again, not a safe place for the preservation of "3 chord country."

Ned McIntosh · Post by **Ned McIntosh** » 14 Apr 2010 3:55 am

in very bad Haiku:-

A Bill Hankey thread,
Sometimes does not make sense.
Refrigerator.

Bill Hankey · Post by **Bill Hankey** » 14 Apr 2010 5:51 am

Ned,

Is this another wave of demagoguery, in the form of eloquent extemporaneous excursions, digressing ultimately into execrations of character? It appears as such.

Gary Newcomb · Post by **Gary Newcomb** » 14 Apr 2010 5:57 am

Bill, I read most all of your threads. Why do they all end up like this?

Ned McIntosh · Post by **Ned McIntosh** » 14 Apr 2010 6:26 am

Bill,

No. Just very bad Haiku.

Bill Hankey · Post by **Bill Hankey** » 14 Apr 2010 6:42 am

Ned,

I'll respond firstly to your perspective of looking over the shoulders concepts. Abstaining from a tentative Pearl Harbor reminiscence would be a good start.

Storm Rosson · Post by **Storm Rosson** » 14 Apr 2010 6:42 am

Bill Hankey wrote:Charles,

In who's hands would you place the preservation of country music? You may think of the brilliant steel guitarist who collaborated with The Rock and Roll Band known as "Dire Straits" (Sp. close, but maybe no cigar). Nah! Not a chance! In another bracket of personality changers, it isn't difficult to find a swarm of bee-like creatures circulating, and ostensibly searching for that sweet nectar that converts into cash flow. Neither would they be suited for influencing the preservation of, Quote: "Sappy three chord country songs." It has been drilled into the heads resting on promising entities, to wit: "All good things must come to an end." It may be reasonable to think that those who go about reciting those familiar words, over and over: "Preserve for future generations", are the least likely subjects to carry the ball faithfully.
The familiar outcry, expressed in many different ways, over time, condenses into a staticky compulsion. Observe for a moment, the various accounts of treatments meted out to elder members of the Opry. "Death On Music Row", was apparently picked up by Jones, Strait, and Jackson for delivering a message that all is not well, as Nashville's hometown country music collides with opportunists. They never fail to spring up to share in the gates intake of curious waves of nonconformists paying big bucks to see for themselves the changes in country music formats. I can't believe that borrowing, and believing in those who display so much grandeur in sophisticated musical settings, will not trip on this currently venturesome approach to expanding, by investing in what may turn out to be another investment with bankers monies. Once again, not a safe place for the preservation of "3 chord country."

Undoubtly the crowning fecal expulsion so far from the top of mr Hankey's perilously high soapbox......you really should where a parachute up there.

Bill Hankey · Post by **Bill Hankey** » 14 Apr 2010 7:02 am

Gary,

Thanks for your outflow of energy and interest. The "COLORISM" of the threads tend to be associated with a combination of negative and positive posts.. submitted at intervals set to be spurred on by a variety of moodiness to gore a concept, with the might of determination to do so. I try not to resist as the forces overrun the fortress of rationale.

Storm Rosson · Post by **Storm Rosson** » 14 Apr 2010 7:36 am

You ever consider bottling that crap and selling it as a laxative?

Bill Hankey · Post by **Bill Hankey** » 14 Apr 2010 8:43 am

Storm,

No! But recollections of past scenarios, places you among the instigators who baffle intellectuals by your ludicrous behavior. It has no place in a society of musicianly inclined individuals. Am I the first to tell you this? I hope so.

Ron Brennan · Post by **Ron Brennan** » 14 Apr 2010 9:46 am

Et Al

Let me be the 2nd!!

Please reference some of the quotes below:

"if he were a woman he would probably like being spanked, and may anyway"

"You ever consider bottling that crap and selling it as a laxative?"

With all due respect, is this really neccessary?
Please, I hope we are all adults here.

Personal insults, like these from the Wolf pack, can & do great harm to many others on this great Forum.

I've seen other forums lose wonderful people because of this type of behavior.

No problem disagreeing with someone and with great vigor, but out of frustration, stoop to this?

This is High School 101..it's not funny....and that's the perception of you when you rely on these types of statements to vent....Further, when one stoops to this , he's the one that loses respect!!

In many Professional & Non-Professional venues, personal insults, vulgur comments and many like them as directed at Mr. Hankey and others here would be considered "Harrasment &/or Intimidation".....Just not acceptable!

I too have differences with BH's writing style but I and many of us respect his right to express himself without being subject to personal insults and harrasment.

Moreover, none of us are perfect, including me......With the overall state of this world, many of our brothers & sisters past and present are dying, injured or lost fighting for our right to speak/write freely in freedom and without harrasment!!........Vist a Vet hospital someday, gurantee you won't take this subject lightly........

Nothing personal intended!!

USN Veteran

CLICK

chris ivey · Post by **chris ivey** » 14 Apr 2010 9:48 am

boy...talk about yer excretions of character...

Bent Romnes · Post by **Bent Romnes** » 14 Apr 2010 9:53 am

Ron Brennan wrote:Et Al

Let me be the 2nd!!

Let me be 3rd.
Ron, you said a mouthful there.

chris ivey · Post by **chris ivey** » 14 Apr 2010 10:14 am

it's the same as 'a band is only as good as the singer'....a thread is only as good as the originator.

don't demand civility/respect/sanity from responders if there is no restriction on the poster.

Joe Casey · Post by **Joe Casey** » 14 Apr 2010 10:22 am

Chris ,Please point out threads where Bill posted harmful content..What I mean by that a personal attack other than reacting to one..

chris ivey · Post by **chris ivey** » 14 Apr 2010 10:32 am

joe..just go back and carefully read 'everything' bill has written since becoming a forum member..if you survive that and still take any of this seriously... i'll think of something else to tell you.
be sure not to miss the epic small print story sandwiched between his ramblings on one thread...one of my finest works!

in my opinion bill's discombobulated contrivances are more abusive than any personal attacks.

Storm Rosson · Post by **Storm Rosson** » 14 Apr 2010 11:04 am

Ditto

Joe Casey · Post by **Joe Casey** » 14 Apr 2010 11:10 am

Chris ,I have known Bill long before he ever became a Forum member..I'm originally from Sacramento (born in Roseville)and when I was in New England Bill is one of the people that helped me gain popularity as well as introducing me to Steelers when I needed one..I do read his post and don't answer many because the man does truly know more about Steel than i'll ever learn..Also the Bill I know is a very nice man and I see a lot of mis-understanding of him on his post..I don't pretend to understand all the words he uses (I barely made it through Christian Brothers High on Broadway in Sac) but nothing he post offends me..There are those on the Forum that can't wait to attack him after each post,But we as humans tend to attack what we don't understand...Whether its Bill or someone else I see no reason for personal attacks..

Danny Bates · Post by **Danny Bates** » 14 Apr 2010 11:24 am

Chris said:

go back and carefully read 'everything' bill has written since becoming a forum member

I know there's no way anybody could read all of the Hankey threads without something bad happening like their brains exploding or something. Climbing Mt. Everest in a speedo would be a much easier task.

But when Chris used words like:

discombobulated contrivances

Now I am startled.... Maybe Chris has read all of the Hankey threads and he's now using those big 75 cent Hankey words in his normal life.. Terrible situation...If that's the case, I'll never read another one of Bill's threads again.

In fact, is there some sort of electroshock brain flushing therapy or medication I can take to prevent this type of Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?

chris ivey · Post by **chris ivey** » 14 Apr 2010 11:28 am

danny...thank you for your concern. you have always been a gentleman!

Danny Bates · Post by **Danny Bates** » 14 Apr 2010 11:38 am

Chris, when we eventually hook up for our "Peanut Butter Jam", I'll loan you my lectrophotomicrograph.

It's a thing like they used in the movie "Men In Black"... It will erase every word of Bill's threads that's stuck your brain.

Bo Legg · Post by **Bo Legg** » 14 Apr 2010 12:01 pm

Here is a Blues tune by Bill Hankey entitled:
“I'm confident, have slipped past those numbering in the thousands, as a result of wheedles by off-the-wall exponents of diversified entertainment. If you are torn between country and rock music, it would be a waste for me to present a true country sound. It looks as though my intuition has paid off handsomely, as far as my judgment of who's who in this column. Those in hog heaven will answer. They owe me nothing.”

As I said that was just the title. The song goes like this

You just a
/[A13]mossy criticaster /[D9] testing the /[A13] cheese /[A13] right off the round you just a /
/[D9]mossy criticaster /[D9] testing the /[A13] cheese /[A13] right off the round you just a /
/[E9] slice off the cheese /[D9] but I'm the whole / [A13]round [F7#9]lord yes /[E7#9]I am[Eb7#9]you just a /