David Doggett wrote:So b0b, if Joe Blow has a post “Hey guys, listen to this clip of me playing Precious Memories;” and I join the thread with the word “Noise” in extra-large type; that’s acceptable Forum behavior?!
Or suppose somebody start’s a post, “Listen to this YouTube of Buddy Emmons playing Way to Survive;” and I post “Noise” in extra-large type; that’s acceptable?!
If the music contains distortion or some other noisy effect, then "noise" is a descriptive term. Even if it doesn't, some people regard certain timbres and even musical styles as noise. It's a common word, used casually quite often. For example: to me, it doesn't matter how well a banjo is played - it always sounds like noise to my ears.
And if in either of these cases somebody objects, and calls my remark “insulting,” the moderator is going to come on the thread an defend my “Noise” comment and criticize the ones who object that it is insulting?!
With all due respect, b0b, maybe your friendly banter with Ms. Lee using this term has dulled your sensitivity to the usual implication of this kind of remark between strangers on a public Forum.
How can you accuse a stranger of being "ethnocentric" based on the word "noise"?
I don’t think anyone would accuse me of being at a loss for words, but try as I may, I cannot think of any word more insulting to a musician than to call his sincere efforts at music “noise.” It is the opposite of music. It is the ultimate insult.
Furthermore, denying that music of another ethnic group is even really music is precisely “intolerant” and “ethnocentric.” I’m baffled about what you must think these terms mean.
I do know some history of Rick’s comments on the Forum. And possibly that gave some added impetus to my response. But I would have responded about the same way to anyone making that remark that way.
I'm sorry, but that's a real stretch. Nothing in a one-word critique implies anything about ethnic groups.
You are the one who brought that subject into this discussion. Perhaps you felt that it was "the elephant in the room" that needed to be acknowledged. But was the elephant really there?
I’m now beginning to feel a little bad for poor Rick, who quickly apologized for his choice of words and dropped the issue. So Rick this is no longer about you. But unfortunately your remark has become the example that is now the bone of contention.
b0b, I am deeply troubled by this development. For a long time it has seemed to me that posts initiating offensive insults are sometimes ignored by some moderators (haven’t really paid attention to who they are), and the moderator only steps in when vigorous responses to the initial insults occur. It seems okay to post an insult, but not to call it an insult. I just assumed that was unconscious oversight and understandable lack of attention. I am now very surprised to discover this may be an intentional policy. This is very troubling, and frankly, to me seems shockingly out of character for you. Of course everyone should be free to express their opinions, likes and dislikes. It is the manner in which that is done, and the acceptance of that manner that is troubling. I truly no longer know where the line is drawn in terms of what is a prohibited personal attack, and what is acceptable personal opinion.
The bottom line is that I wouldn't have noticed if I hadn't received an emailed complaint. With thousands of members to watch, I have a very short memory of any specific person's posting history. I saw a negative review of a RR concert starting this topic, a one word response supporting that reviewer's negative review, and then a sudden diatribe about ethnic intolerance. Which would
you consider to be a personal attack?