On The Twelfth Day Of Judgment
Moderators: Dave Mudgett, Brad Bechtel
-
Barry Blackwood
- Posts: 7350
- Joined: 20 Apr 2005 12:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jack Dougherty
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Spring Hill, Florida, USA
- State/Province: Florida
- Country: United States
Joe..
With all due respect this has nothing to do with Bills character or how smart he is. The process was arrived at by Bills own writings. The responses of the forum members have only been to have him stop trying to impress us with his obscuration regarding syntax. In other words "Get to the point"
Once again... ask a question without subterfuge and then you will get serious comments without the added remarks.
JD
With all due respect this has nothing to do with Bills character or how smart he is. The process was arrived at by Bills own writings. The responses of the forum members have only been to have him stop trying to impress us with his obscuration regarding syntax. In other words "Get to the point"
Once again... ask a question without subterfuge and then you will get serious comments without the added remarks.
JD
-
Bill Hankey
- Posts: 7666
- Joined: 13 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Pittsfield, MA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
basilh
- Posts: 7710
- Joined: 26 May 1999 12:01 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Bill, are you seriously expecting to be taken seriously when you reply like this.
You say your "bid to correspond": I was labouring under the obvious misconception that correspond per se was a two-way process.
Most of your posts don't ask opinions of a particular subject but are a series of related facts and statements as though you were some kind of "Oracle"
Phrases like, "what do YOU think of" or "What if" or "is it" etc are noticeable by their absence from most of your attempts to impress the rest of us with your use of "English" which, by the way, is far removed from either the conversational form or NORMAL correspondence usage..
As far as having to be an accomplished player to qualify to comment on YOUR threads, I think that on an "Open" forum the thread's ownership passes from the original poster to the vox populi once posted..
I'm sure there are many on this forum who, if they wished, could formulate the kind of theories that you grind out ad nauseum, they don't do so, ever wondered why ?
No one is deliberately trying to insult you or make little of your posts, but communicating is what you said, and communicating is obviously what you are NOT doing, at least on a level understood by most.
.... and Bill, this is NOT meant to be anything other than helpful, If we can get you to "Communicate" instead of "Postulating" self evident assumptions, it will be a good day for us all..
Who says the outbursts are "Unethical" ? if indeed they ARE 'outbursts', and by the way, it's whomsoever.Regardless of the timbre of unethical outbursts, I patiently await the return of normal responses to my bid to correspond. Whomever would engage in searches for subjects to absorb their rancorous posturings, which amount to repudiating the smallest details of any subject matter, is a discredit to the typically sincere steel guitarist. The approaches to a better view of this global trait, that points to an annoyance of improvement through education and new ideas, is puzzling.
You say your "bid to correspond": I was labouring under the obvious misconception that correspond per se was a two-way process.
Most of your posts don't ask opinions of a particular subject but are a series of related facts and statements as though you were some kind of "Oracle"
Phrases like, "what do YOU think of" or "What if" or "is it" etc are noticeable by their absence from most of your attempts to impress the rest of us with your use of "English" which, by the way, is far removed from either the conversational form or NORMAL correspondence usage..
As far as having to be an accomplished player to qualify to comment on YOUR threads, I think that on an "Open" forum the thread's ownership passes from the original poster to the vox populi once posted..
I'm sure there are many on this forum who, if they wished, could formulate the kind of theories that you grind out ad nauseum, they don't do so, ever wondered why ?
No one is deliberately trying to insult you or make little of your posts, but communicating is what you said, and communicating is obviously what you are NOT doing, at least on a level understood by most.
.... and Bill, this is NOT meant to be anything other than helpful, If we can get you to "Communicate" instead of "Postulating" self evident assumptions, it will be a good day for us all..
-
Bill Hankey
- Posts: 7666
- Joined: 13 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Pittsfield, MA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Stu Schulman
- Posts: 6523
- Joined: 15 Oct 1998 12:01 am
- Location: Ulster Park New Yawk (deceased)
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Jack...Pull the ripcord!
Steeltronics Z-pickup,Desert Rose S-10 4+5,Desert Rose Keyless S-10 3+5... Mullen G2 S-10 3+5,Telonics 206 pickups,Telonics volume pedal.,Blanton SD -10,Emmons GS_10...Zirctone bar,Bill Groner Bar...any amp that isn't broken.Steel Seat.Com seats...Licking paint chips off of Chinese Toys since 1952.
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Bill Hankey...
This was an original song co-written and performed by the Hose Brothers. HoseA and HoseB. The first verse of the song starts out..the phone rang “greeeen greeeen” I picked it up and said “Yellow”. Bill I can't tell if you're using flowery language or sniffing the lilac air freshener."Gringo The Lilacs"
-
C. Christofferson
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 3 Mar 2006 1:01 am
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Browse www.anewlife.org try "What's new"
-
Jack Dougherty
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Spring Hill, Florida, USA
- State/Province: Florida
- Country: United States
Bill..
I would agree with you one hundred percent. As a retired airline pilot, flying from the cockpit perspective is surely not for all. See... ask the question.... get the answer
PS: Please view any comments I have made as matter of fact and in no way intended to impugn your integrity or intent. As we have never met, I can only assume your choice of words is meant to tantalize our cortex and respond with great aplomb.
JD
I would agree with you one hundred percent. As a retired airline pilot, flying from the cockpit perspective is surely not for all. See... ask the question.... get the answer
PS: Please view any comments I have made as matter of fact and in no way intended to impugn your integrity or intent. As we have never met, I can only assume your choice of words is meant to tantalize our cortex and respond with great aplomb.
JD
-
Archie Nicol R.I.P.
- Posts: 6829
- Joined: 25 Aug 2004 12:01 am
- Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Alan Brookes
- Posts: 13227
- Joined: 29 Mar 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Brummy living in Southern California
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jack Dougherty
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Spring Hill, Florida, USA
- State/Province: Florida
- Country: United States
-
Doug Beaumier
- Posts: 16061
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Northampton, MA
- State/Province: Massachusetts
- Country: United States
Whoever vs. Whomever, as relates to the steel guitar.
Rule 1. To determine whether to use whoever or whomever, here is the rule:
him + he = whoever
him + him = whomever
Examples: Give it to whoever/whomever asks for it first.
Give it to him. He asks for it first.
Therefore, Give it to whoever asks for it first.
We will hire whoever/whomever you recommend.
We will hire him. You recommend him.
him + him = whomever
We will hire whoever/whomever is most qualified.
We will hire him. He is most qualified.
him + he = whoever
Rule 2. When the entire whoever/whomever clause is the subject of the verb that follows the clause, look inside the clause to determine whether to use whoever or whomever.
Examples: Whoever is elected will serve a four-year term.
Whoever is elected is the subject of will serve.
Whoever is the subject of is.
Whomever you elect will serve a four-year term.
Whomever you elect is the subject of will serve.
Whomever is the object of you elect.
I hope this clarifies things, as relates to the steel guitar.
Rule 1. To determine whether to use whoever or whomever, here is the rule:
him + he = whoever
him + him = whomever
Examples: Give it to whoever/whomever asks for it first.
Give it to him. He asks for it first.
Therefore, Give it to whoever asks for it first.
We will hire whoever/whomever you recommend.
We will hire him. You recommend him.
him + him = whomever
We will hire whoever/whomever is most qualified.
We will hire him. He is most qualified.
him + he = whoever
Rule 2. When the entire whoever/whomever clause is the subject of the verb that follows the clause, look inside the clause to determine whether to use whoever or whomever.
Examples: Whoever is elected will serve a four-year term.
Whoever is elected is the subject of will serve.
Whoever is the subject of is.
Whomever you elect will serve a four-year term.
Whomever you elect is the subject of will serve.
Whomever is the object of you elect.
I hope this clarifies things, as relates to the steel guitar.
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
basilh
- Posts: 7710
- Joined: 26 May 1999 12:01 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21830
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jack Dougherty
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Spring Hill, Florida, USA
- State/Province: Florida
- Country: United States
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Jack Dougherty
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Spring Hill, Florida, USA
- State/Province: Florida
- Country: United States
-
Richard Damron
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: 23 Jul 2007 2:51 pm
- Location: Gallatin, Tennessee, USA (deceased)
- State/Province: Tennessee
- Country: United States
Your Cut of "Donna Lee"
Highly edited by the author since I am thoroughly "confufled".
Thanks, Bas.
Richard
Thanks, Bas.
Richard
Last edited by Richard Damron on 24 Feb 2008 3:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
basilh
- Posts: 7710
- Joined: 26 May 1999 12:01 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Richard, Methinks you're confufled about the two Bills..
It's Bill Hatcher who plays the Donna Lee bit..
and just in case the "Original" Bill is still having problems with his "Web TV" I've included a link that should work on almost anything..
Click Here
Lap Steel eh ! some form of Diatonic tuning Bill ?
It's Bill Hatcher who plays the Donna Lee bit..
and just in case the "Original" Bill is still having problems with his "Web TV" I've included a link that should work on almost anything..
Click Here
Lap Steel eh ! some form of Diatonic tuning Bill ?
-
Richard Damron
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: 23 Jul 2007 2:51 pm
- Location: Gallatin, Tennessee, USA (deceased)
- State/Province: Tennessee
- Country: United States
-
Bill Hankey
- Posts: 7666
- Joined: 13 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Pittsfield, MA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Bill Hatcher,
I was able to hear "Donna Lee" after Basilh changed the link. It's excellent, and a treat to hear your pick attack. It would be interesting to try to dope out those major sevens, ninths, and seven flat five chords. I wish that I could hear an hour of your repertoire. The "Donna Lee" rendition sums up your ability to tackle classical or jazz genres with ease. Thanks to you and Basilh for presenting the link.
I was able to hear "Donna Lee" after Basilh changed the link. It's excellent, and a treat to hear your pick attack. It would be interesting to try to dope out those major sevens, ninths, and seven flat five chords. I wish that I could hear an hour of your repertoire. The "Donna Lee" rendition sums up your ability to tackle classical or jazz genres with ease. Thanks to you and Basilh for presenting the link.
-
Bill Hankey
- Posts: 7666
- Joined: 13 Apr 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Pittsfield, MA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
