The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Which software to buy
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Which software to buy
Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 8 Nov 2006 1:15 pm    
Reply with quote

I'm gonna upgrade my software(PC). Now I have Ntrak, it works well, but is only 16 bit. The upgrade will cost $75, I have a very old version. The question, should I go with a more standard system? I want to spend around $100, so I'm looking at Cakewalk, Cubase, Pro Tools(light versions). I need 24 track, 24 bit, 96Khz, the ability to use VST plugins. I have Delta 10-10LT, a 1.3 Athlon PC,512Ram. Thanks for your ideas, JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Ray Minich

 

From:
Bradford, Pa. Frozen Tundra
Post  Posted 8 Nov 2006 2:39 pm    
Reply with quote

Buy an upscale soundcard and then build a PC around it. It's the soundcard that will give you 24 bit 96kHz audio, nothing else in the PC cares...
For stereo work the Soundblaster Audigy Pro series may be acceptable.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 8 Nov 2006 6:06 pm    
Reply with quote

RM, Delta 10-10 has 24 bit 96khz, my software does not support the higher resolutions without an upgrade. Thanks, JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

David L. Donald


From:
Koh Samui Island, Thailand
Post  Posted 8 Nov 2006 11:24 pm    
Reply with quote

I put a Delta 10-10 in a pc for a friend,
he is still happy with it.
Partly because it has essentially remained invisible to him.
ie. no problems.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Randy Cordle


From:
Illinois, USA
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 5:01 am    
Reply with quote

May I suggest Tracktion?
Had Pro Audio 9 and don't use it anymore after I started using Mackie Tracktion. http://www.mackie.com/products/tracktion2/index.html
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Mark van Allen


From:
Watkinsville, Ga. USA
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 10:06 am    
Reply with quote

I beg to differ with Ray, but if you went with a ProTools LE rack or desk rig, the soundcard doesn't even come into play. All of the conversion and processing is done in the rack and program, connect via firewire.
You monitor through external amp/ spkrs or powered monitors, like most studio configurations. I've been using the LE rack system for Pro level recordings for some time now, and it does everything I want.
24 bit 96K no problem. I generally record 24 bit at 41.5. So far, so good. And translates easily to most any other pro studio if need be.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Mark van Allen


From:
Watkinsville, Ga. USA
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 10:08 am    
Reply with quote

Oops- I missed the $100 limit... I don't think you'll get into a good ProTools interface box for under $300 (M-box, etc.)
I got my digi-002 rack for $600 used from somebody upgrading to HD, and it's paid for itself 25 or 30 times over...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 10:23 am    
Reply with quote

My hardware is fine everyone. I'm taliking about software only. Looking at Sonar, Traction, Pro tools Le, and ??? JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

John Macy

 

From:
Rockport TX/Denver CO
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 9:05 pm    
Reply with quote

ProTools LE only works with DigiDesign hardware (they do have a version that runs on MAudio hardware, but not as versatile in going back and forth...) They don't call them The Evil Empire for nuting...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

John Macy

 

From:
Rockport TX/Denver CO
Post  Posted 9 Nov 2006 9:09 pm    
Reply with quote

Hey Mark, 24 Bit/41.5??? Sounds cool--what do you know that we don't...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

David L. Donald


From:
Koh Samui Island, Thailand
Post  Posted 10 Nov 2006 7:34 am    
Reply with quote

ya done been caught in typo hell.
Engineers are such exacting sorts ;(
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 10 Nov 2006 7:45 am    
Reply with quote

Traction is looking pretty cool, and different. Anyone else use this? JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Jonathan Shacklock


From:
London, UK
Post  Posted 10 Nov 2006 7:54 am    
Reply with quote

I'm with Randy: big fan of Tracktion.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Reggie Duncan

 

From:
Mississippi
Post  Posted 10 Nov 2006 4:04 pm    
Reply with quote

24 Bit/41.5.........tell us more?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

John Macy

 

From:
Rockport TX/Denver CO
Post  Posted 11 Nov 2006 12:28 pm    
Reply with quote

Could probably turn this into a marketing angle...

By the way David, aren't we due for more pictures???

[This message was edited by John Macy on 11 November 2006 at 12:29 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

David L. Donald


From:
Koh Samui Island, Thailand
Post  Posted 11 Nov 2006 10:59 pm    
Reply with quote

Nothing new till mid December,
progress went into slow motion.. DRAT!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bob Martin


From:
Madison Tn
Post  Posted 12 Nov 2006 2:40 am    
Reply with quote

Hi Jim, no matter what anyone says there is no standard in recording sw. If you already have Tracktition or any other sw app and you know how to operate it and like all the features then there's absolutely no question. Buy what you already know how to use unless you're a glutton for the punishment of the steep learning curve of buying a new sw recording app. Why switch to an unknown sw app and start from the beginning? as long as you can upgrade to the newer version of your app and you like it stick with it.

In todays recording world it doesn't make a whole lot of difference what sw app you use you can import wav tracks into most of them so you will be able to work on other peoples tracks no matter what sw app they were recorded in.

Now if your current sw app has a lot of little things that bugs you well then the answer is completely different but like I say if you like everything except the 16 bit limit and you can upgrade that cheap it's a no brainer.

I use Sonar and other folks love it but the next guy that comes along might use a hardware recorder and swear by it so why not go with what you already know???????

Bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Mark van Allen


From:
Watkinsville, Ga. USA
Post  Posted 14 Nov 2006 9:11 pm    
Reply with quote

Man, the dyslexic typist never gets a break from you engineer types.
Looking on page 662 of the manual I find I should be going with 43.141592653589....
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Ben Jones


From:
Seattle, Washington, USA
Post  Posted 15 Nov 2006 11:25 am    
Reply with quote

another Tracktion user here. very satisfied , very easy to use.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

James Quackenbush

 

From:
Pomona, New York, USA
Post  Posted 16 Nov 2006 6:34 pm    
Reply with quote

Tracktion is not as full featured as a lot of other programs , but each release has more and more added to it ....It's a very easy interface to grasp ...I like it a lot for an "easy to use " program ... The engine in Tracktion is a nice sounding unit also ...You could do better, but you could do a lot worse too !!....Not a bad product ...
There are a lot of companies that have demo's of their programs also ....Pick the one you feel the most comfortable with ..Jim
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 17 Nov 2006 6:13 pm    
Reply with quote

Well, today I bought Sonar home studio, I think it is the best bang for the buck, and does all I want to do. Cubase was $40 more. I was leaning towards traction, but the demo version locked up my puter, and some local friends talked me out of it. Thanks for all your suggestions, I considered them all. JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

James Quackenbush

 

From:
Pomona, New York, USA
Post  Posted 18 Nov 2006 8:23 am    
Reply with quote

Jim,
Sonar is probably the most used sequencer software out there for PC ...You made a good choice ...I mentioned Tracktion for it's ease of use , but if you start now with a lesser version of Sonar , you will be versed in Sonar when you make the move to the more advanced version .... Good choice !!..Enjoy !!....Sincerely,Jim
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bob Martin


From:
Madison Tn
Post  Posted 21 Nov 2006 11:07 am    
Reply with quote

Hey Jim, I'm certain you'll like Sonar Home Studio. It has a great engine beneath the hood. I think it uses Sonar 3's engine which was a very stable and fast engine and had all the bugs worked out. When I say engine I'm just referring to the software that runs the recording process. There are many folks here on the board that use Sonar so good luck and let us know if we can be of any help.

Bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jim Peters


From:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 21 Nov 2006 4:42 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks again for all your help! I am now in the typical hell of learning a new program, but I do have a lot of patience. JP
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP