The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Emmons pp - bolt-on vs split-tail
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Emmons pp - bolt-on vs split-tail
John Groover McDuffie


From:
LA California, USA
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 8:51 am    
Reply with quote

I've seen a lot of references to Emmons bolt-on guitars and they seem to be a preferred era. Is this correct. What are the perceived differences in sound and/or playability/mechanical function?
If someone can post a couple of close-up pics showing the difference in what the two types look like I would appreciate that. Thanks
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 9:21 am    
Reply with quote

One is great and the other is just as good.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Mark Herrick


From:
Bakersfield, CA
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 9:27 am    
Reply with quote

Here's a site that might help...
http://www.melmusic.com/laceyj/page04.html

Here are some really good shots of a bolt-on changer:
http://home.earthlink.net/~bradsarno/66photos.html

And there is a fairly good shot of the end of a cut-tail changer in this thread (8th post in):
http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/006411.html

You can see the screws that hold the changer axle supports and the gaps next to them where the end of the neck is "cut."

[This message was edited by Mark Herrick on 06 June 2006 at 10:38 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 12:06 pm    
Reply with quote

I'm not really an Emmons' guitar afficianado. That said, I prefer the original "wrap around" better than either the "bolt on" or the "cut tail" ("split tail"). Both the bolt-on and the cut-tail were Ron Lashley re-designs. The "wrap" was the guitar that Buddy originally designed, and that's the one I like best!

Maybe Buddy will step in and tell us the story about Randy Reinhard's "horn of plenty".
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

richard burton


From:
Britain
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 1:17 pm    
Reply with quote

I'll stick my neck out and say that the bolt-on will have the better tone.

The downside is that it will also have more tuning instability due to temperature fluctuations.

I own a pull-release steel, with a bolt-on changer.

The tone is superb.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Herb Steiner

 

From:
Spicewood TX 78669
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 4:40 pm    
Reply with quote

Ron Lashley Sr. and I had this very conversation about 15 years ago. I was playing a 66 bolt-on at the time and Ron stated quite plainly he felt the bolt-on was his favorite model of Emmons guitar for *THAT* tone.

He also asked if I had any intonation problems. That guitar is a good one and had no more problems with thermoexpansion than most guitars I've owned. He said he felt the bolt-on got an undeserved reputation for tuning touchiness, which I believe it has.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bob Hoffnar


From:
Austin, Tx
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 6:18 pm    
Reply with quote

To my ear there is a bit of a difference. The bolt on sounds more compressed. In a good way. I toured and recorded with my bolt on for quite a while and never had any weird tuning issues with it. I was borrowing Greg Leisz's bolt on for gigs out in LA and his steel had the same caracture. Nothing like them.

------------------
Bob
upcoming gigs
My Website



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Frank Parish

 

From:
Nashville,Tn. USA
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 6:47 pm    
Reply with quote

I've had a few split tails and one bolt-on. Two of the split tails had the best tone to my ears and a few others that play them as well. The one I have now is what I think is the best of them all. It's a wood body with alluminum necks, split tail. I never had any tuning issues with the bolt-on. The tone was compressed as Bob stated but certainly didn't hurt it in any way. The wraparounds I've heard are a thinner tone I didn't care for.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Randy Gilliam

 

From:
San Antonio, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 6 Jun 2006 7:03 pm    
Reply with quote

Bobbe I Have a 2006 Legrande 111 I dont know what kind Of tail it Has If any. But it sure does sound good . I heard Steve Palousek Sunday At the Cotton Club On A Legrande 111 It Sounded Awesome. I Have Had My new Rains about A Month Almost time Too start Shopping Again. Randy
View user's profile Send private message

Jay Ganz


From:
Out Behind The Barn
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 5:37 am    
Reply with quote

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

John Groover McDuffie


From:
LA California, USA
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 7:41 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks everyone, I've got it now.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 11:20 am    
Reply with quote

Randy, I know exectly what you are saying. I have had several folks wanting to make this same trade. Seems like to "OLD" standards just keep being the standards by which all others are measured.

I am restoring two "Wrap arounds" at the time and one "Bolt on", the "Wraparound" is not the greatest one of the three because of one serious design flaw it has. This Flaw only became appearent after a year or so of use, and so the "Bolt on" was built to fix the flaw.
Ask Stu Basore about this problem, his new '64 Emmons had to be modified (after he sold it) to be playable.
Actually, the split neck is seriously the great one of the pack for, tone, dependability, and so on. Why else would they have stayed with this design for the years '67 to '88?

A nice restoration trick is to install the split neck saddle blocks in to the Wrap around neck. (requiers a simple mod to the blocks and redrilling the mounting holes) This gives you the best of both worlds.

Bobbe

[This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 07 June 2006 at 12:24 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 11:32 am    
Reply with quote

Most people forget that there was one more Emmons design for suspending the fingers at the bridge. Guess which one it was, there were over 390 made, but will never be any more.

Yep, FOUR different Emmons changer mounts. Bolt on, Wrap, Split and the---->


Yep, guess which one, I'll be watching to who figures this one out first.


Bobbe

[This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 07 June 2006 at 12:34 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

richard burton


From:
Britain
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 12:20 pm    
Reply with quote

I think this is the short-lived changer that you are referring to, Bobbe

[This message was edited by richard burton on 07 June 2006 at 01:21 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 4:41 pm    
Reply with quote

Ha Ha! Richard, this ain't it! But I appreciate the answer.

When I tell you guys, you'll say "oh yes, of course".

Bobbe
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Herb Steiner

 

From:
Spicewood TX 78669
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 6:23 pm    
Reply with quote

Among my past bolt-ons are Dicky Overbey's and Bob Hoffnar's... excellent guitars no doubt. But I still have a weak spot for the wraparound, as do my compadres Bobby Flores, Jim Loessberg, and Randy Reinhardt.

The wraparound, at least those I've played and owned have that certain "I don't know what"... or as a country boy might say, a "Jenny Say Kwah" (pardon the hillbilly French) ... that seems to sing my song. I have two doubles and a single that are in use all the time.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Brendan Mitchell


From:
Melbourne Australia
Post  Posted 7 Jun 2006 7:09 pm    
Reply with quote

Bobbe are you talking about the bolt on style changer on the BlackRock ?
Brendan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Nick Reed


From:
Russellville, KY USA
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2006 7:28 am    
Reply with quote

Brendan,
Yes, and your Emmons Blackrock does have that Changer. Great Guitar, you better hang on to that one.
Nick

My '66 S-10 Bolt-on
(not the Blackrock model)

[This message was edited by Nick Reed on 11 June 2006 at 08:29 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

TRAP TRULY

 

From:
Mobile , AL
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2006 8:57 am    
Reply with quote

This ia a little off the topic ..but what about the tone differences of the bolt-ons with wood neck inserts compared to the aluminum necks bolt-on?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2006 9:34 am    
Reply with quote

No, there have been four different type saddle block changers on Emmons guitars since day one.
This includes P-P and Legrande.
What are they? This should be VERY easy,
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Willis Vanderberg


From:
Petoskey Mi
Post  Posted 21 Jun 2006 7:06 pm    
Reply with quote

I am waiting ?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobby Boggs

 

From:
Upstate SC.
Post  Posted 21 Jun 2006 7:21 pm    
Reply with quote

Trap,I've owned both.The aluminum necks bolt-on had more sustain and has a little brighter sound the wood neck bolt ons.

The wood neck bolt ons sounded more like the Cut tails than they did the aluminum bolt ons. At least mine did..........bb
View user's profile Send private message

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 22 Jun 2006 4:40 am    
Reply with quote

Weren't there two different wraparounds made? I seem to recall a "narrow mount" and a "wide mount" version.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Chuck McGill


From:
An hour from Memphis and 2 from Nashville, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 22 Jun 2006 5:44 am    
Reply with quote

Would it be the current all pull?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobbe Seymour

 

From:
Hendersonville TN USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 22 Jun 2006 9:27 am    
Reply with quote

Nope, I'll tell you, four basic different finger mounting methods, the three obvious ones (Wrap,Bolt and split) and the first LeGrande models. The Sho-Bud style, with the divider between each finger. Refered to as the "divided Finger" modle. There you have it, four different systems.

Bobbe
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP