“Tone” The End Result

Larry Ball · From: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada

“I Ask” why is the “Tone” in your recording the same regardless of the PSG that you recorded with.

I have listened for years to six string and steel recordings and the sound or tone of the guitar is same. Therefore all the mechanics applied to recording appear not to have influenced the sound. Eg: I watched a particular home studio individual record many six string guitars (Fender, Gibson etc, etc.)with the end result they all sound the same. I know from experience those guitars have very distinct tones. Also I have listened to a number of Utube Videos of Steel Players making home studio videos playing different steels. Same end result..”No” change in tone.

So what effects the “Tone” in the recording? I know this may open up a wall of opinions but there has to be a main element in the process that controls this.
_________________
Mullen SD10, Sho~Bud SD10 LDG, Show-Pro SD10 LDG, Peavey Nashville 112, Boss Katana 100 MK11, Telonic's F100 Multi-Taper Super Pro V/P,

Dan Kelly · From: Boston, MA

Hey Larry - In my mind, the starting point is to differentiate between the sound of a PSG in the role of a back up / fill instrument versus the sound of a PSG as the featured instrumental track. In the first case, the PSG sound or tone can be, as you say, perceived to be "the same" from recording to recording. That is not to say the playing is the same... just that some producers have an expectation of what a PSG should sound like in the mix.

However, when it comes to an instrumental track where it is all about the PSG, I hear big differences. Try listening to something Joe Goldmark did and compare it to something Randy Beavers did. I am not saying one is better than another... just that the tone of the PSG in the recording is way different. I am outta time right now, but I will see if I can circle back and post a couple of Soundcloud tracks that demonstrate this.

BTW, it is not only producers that have an expectation of what a PSG should sound like... many players have an expectation as well. During the 70's, it seems to me that players were more willing to record PSG instrumental tracks with sound and tone ideas that were more risky or experimental. Pete Drake's "Talking Steel and Strings" album is an example. Buddy Emmons' "Witches Brew" is another. Some of the experiments stood the test of time, some did not. It seems to me that today, players gravitate to the "expected" sound and that expectation has become "homogenized." Players today seem to want to distinguish themselves by their playing ability rather than experiment with a sound or tone that is outside of general expectations.
_________________
blah, blah, blah.
Hey You Kids! Get Off My Lawn!
blah, blah, blah.

Larry Ball · From: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada

Hi Dan,

I agree that two Steelers sound different on mixes coming from different studios. Yes producers have their preconceptions of sound that they want to hear in the mix.

Home Sudio's is where you hear the same sound coming from different guitars.
So what causes "That" . The software, The DAW , The Audio Interface or the signal chain.
_________________
Mullen SD10, Sho~Bud SD10 LDG, Show-Pro SD10 LDG, Peavey Nashville 112, Boss Katana 100 MK11, Telonic's F100 Multi-Taper Super Pro V/P,

Tony Prior · From: Charlotte NC

Edward Dixon · From: Crestview Florida

imo...

There are many variables involved but the 1st 3 are most important.

1. The instrument, including the strings and pickup(s).
2. The player. Meaning the player's technique used to vibrate the string. Tone starts with the hands.
3. Amplification and what the player's ear wants to hear.

These 3 are the same live or recorded. After that, care needs to be taken not to alter things that do not need to be altered. The only time I mess with anything in the DAW is when an instrument doesn't quite sit well in a mix with other instruments. Usually it's just a matter of pan and level, I hardly ever touch EQ settings in the DAW. I believe the Audio interface and the DAW must be completely transparent, which for me results in more playing and less tweaking.

Your mileage may vary...
_________________
"Faith don't need no second opinion."

Larry Ball · From: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada

Thank You Gentlemen for your responses.

I agree with your comments about basically everything. I just wondered when a Franklin Steel sounds the same in a home recording as another steel does that’s why I asked the question..
_________________
Mullen SD10, Sho~Bud SD10 LDG, Show-Pro SD10 LDG, Peavey Nashville 112, Boss Katana 100 MK11, Telonic's F100 Multi-Taper Super Pro V/P,

Tony Prior · From: Charlotte NC

One thing to keep in mind here as we discuss the Steel and EQ for recording. On the gigs we each set our tones as we desire, we don't interfere with other instruments as we have our own separate amps and speakers. There is NO competition for EQ and space.

With tracking, every instrument is competing for EQ freq's and space, as all the music is coming out of the same speakers and from the same amp. Its a pallet of "colors" all meshed together.

While the two worlds, LIVE and TRACKING, seem similar, they are not. The premium engineers separate all instruments in the spectrum without disturbing the dynamics of each individual instrument , and at the same time bringing each instrument to life with the appropriate EQ profile.

On the gigs, this is what we do, we tweak until we hear what we think is "good stuff" from our amp. In the MIX we have to do it for EACH instrument on the track , it can be subtle or dramatic otherwise one track may very well interfere with another which may cause TWO tracks to be somewhat lifeless.

Understanding EQ and Space takes us from , "that sounds nice" to " WOW that sounds great" !

Its quite an art ( and challenge)

OF course , those of us who track at home for fun, pleasure , or for sharing our music with others, the importance is not critical, but in a RETAIL setting, the mix may be more important than the music we are listening to ! Shocked

RE: Its a great track but the song is lousy !
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website

Bud Angelotti · From: Larryville, NJ, USA

Hi Larry - May I start by most respectfully disagreeing with you.
[url] Home Studio's is where you hear the same sound coming from different guitars. [/url]
I could not disagree more.
The steel I hear on most modern recordings mostly sounds the same, to me.
Stick in the mud? Yup.
Point is, Pro studios can sound the same also, nowadays.
So how do they, WE, get a unique tone that does not sound like the other steels.
Ever notice how certain guitar players for instance, regular 6 string guitar players, have a unique style or sound? You can tell it's a certain player by maybe 3 notes. They have developed their own thing! Their own sound, their own tone. However they did it.
Check this out -- Kenny G.
You may love 'em, you may hate 'em, does not matter. What matters is you hear 3 notes and you know it's Kenny G. and he expresses his own tone and personality.
It's personality THRU the instrument.
Thats what I think any way.
Happy New Year!
_________________
Just 'cause I look stupid, don't mean I'm not.

Larry Ball · From: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada

Hi Bud..

Thanks for your response…

I am well aware of styles that effect tone on all instruments. I am not talking about Professional recording studios…they have everything at their fingertips to create whatever sound they want. I think Tony probably explained everything in the most technical terms possibly. I simply said a six string guitar player playing in his “Home Studio” that I have listened too. Eg: plays a Fender.. the tone of the recording sounds the same as when he plays a Gibson or other types of guitars. I am not listening to his style but his “Tone” on the recording that is being played back from his Home Studio Recording Equipment.

“THAT” has always been my question?

Listening too different steel players on Utube playing in different studios “YES” they all have their own “STYLE” and “TONE”

Again listening to different steels being played in the same home studio through the same “Signal Chain, DAW, Etc, Etc, Etc, the tone sounds the same.
_________________
Mullen SD10, Sho~Bud SD10 LDG, Show-Pro SD10 LDG, Peavey Nashville 112, Boss Katana 100 MK11, Telonic's F100 Multi-Taper Super Pro V/P,

Tony Prior · From: Charlotte NC

Lets not overlook that thousands of Steel guitar players all want to sound like the same "ONE" guy and tweak away until they are pretty close Maybe everyone is chasing the same reference ! Laughing

This is also true in TELECASTER and STRATOCASTER land. Shocked

_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website

David Mitchell · From: Tyler, Texas

Maurice Anderson once said you can give any steel guitar and any amp any tone you want by turning equalization knobs and that's true to a great extent and that's the reason why an engineer or musician keeps getting the same tone regardless of guitar, amp or recording equipment. In their brain that's the sound they want to hear and they keep reaching for it on every recording session although their choices are almost unlimited. Everybody has their own idea of what a good sound is.

Tony Prior · From: Charlotte NC

Steve Mueller · From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Tony,
That's a great description of use of an EQ.
Thanks!
_________________
2016 Williams D12 8 x 8, 2015 Williams D12 8 x 8, 2023 Williams S12 4 x 5, Milkman Amps, 1974 Gibson Byrdland

Dale Rottacker · From: Walla Walla Washington, USA

Tone has always been a bit of a mystery to me. So much like Music Theory that I would not say I understand it, or be able to equate what mids sound like by using English to express it. I'm no Tony Prior when it comes to explaining Eq.

A wise man, (David Mitchell) told me once WAY back when, to get the sound you want before you ever record a thing and then record THAT. So I just twist knobs on the amp till I like what I hear, and hope that my DAW and Mic are transparent enough to not alter that very much. I must admit, that my ear seems to accept Tone of steel AND steel players IF it falls within a certain range, but if that Tone falls outside of my prescribed envelope then I get a funnier look on my face than the one I was born with.

Its pretty rare that I do any actual Eq'ing of the Steel itself in the DAW. That said I do Eq the Reverb.

Tony said something I found interesting and true, though I hadn't thought about it the way Tony explained. I have noticed that when recording without a track, that whatever guitar I'm recording with, they all sound very close. HOWEVER, when recording to a track that can change quite a bit. What sounds clear and crisp all by itself, can sound less clear and crisp and even sometimes a little dark or muddy when recording to a track. And frankly I'm not sure I've gotten very good at setting the steel in the right sonic space.

And there's my unedjamicated rambling two cents worth.
_________________
Dale Rottacker, Steelinatune™
*2021 MSA Legend, "Jolly Rancher" D10 10x9
*2021 Rittenberry, "The Concord" D10 9x9
*1977 Blue Sho-Bud Pro 3 Custom 8x6
https://msapedalsteels.com
http://rittenberrysteelguitars.com
https://www.telonics.com/index.php
https://www.p2pamps.com
https://www.quilterlabs.com

Tony Prior · From: Charlotte NC

Dale Rottacker · From: Walla Walla Washington, USA

Bob Hoffnar · From: Austin, Tx

All guitars don't sound the same when they are recorded and EQ doesn't do much of anything to alter the fundamental sound of a pedalsteel. It's more about how the steel resonates and holds or looses the various partials of the overtone series. There are so many variables when it comes to timbre. You can insist that you can make an MSA sound like an Emmons but you would be wrong.

The issue of "everything sounds the same" is a matter of subjective judgement. Many people think all country music sounds the same. The people that say that do not listen with their ears.
_________________
Bob

Fred Treece · From: California, USA

From an amateur’s point of view, EQ (live or recording) is pretty basic and is largely about attenuating 4 things about guitar amp tone:
-The Mud
-The Boom
-The Honk
-The Shrill

I just started using a Focusrite interface last year. It produces a pretty true and transparent sound from the line out of my amp.

Tony’s post “rings true” for me. Just yesterday I did some EQ on my live rig for an acoustic guitar. The bass/mid/treble starting point was acceptable, but it needed processing to sound more acoustic. It made a huge difference. Tone may be “in the hands”, but that is a loaded phrase if there ever was one.

Personally, I’m okay with steel guitars all sounding relatively close to the same, whether you think that's the case or not. It allows me to pay attention more to what the player is playing than how it sounds. Like Classical guitar.

Forum Index > Recording		Next oldest topic :: Next newest topic