The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Volume Pedal - Active or Passive?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic

What volume pedal are you using?
A pot pedal
41%
 41%  [ 57 ]
Hilton
29%
 29%  [ 41 ]
Telonics
22%
 22%  [ 31 ]
Goodrich Active Pedal
5%
 5%  [ 8 ]
None or Other
0%
 0%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 138

Author Topic:  Volume Pedal - Active or Passive?
Carl Mesrobian


From:
Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 9:00 am    
Reply with quote

I'd like to hear from any Telonics, Hilton, or Goodrich Hi Pro or Lo Pro pedal users. I use a pot pedal on my Emmons right now.

Do you have a favorite? Has anyone posted a test video on the different pedals, sort of a "shootout"?

Thanks for any input.
_________________
--carl

"The better it gets, the fewer of us know it." Ray Brown
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jack Stoner


From:
Kansas City, MO
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 9:22 am    
Reply with quote

I use a Hilton. Along with no tone change there is no pot or mechanism to change.

I have an old Goodrich 120 pot pedal. My wife is using it and it had an original Allen Bradley pot in it that finally developed a bad spot. I replaced it with a Dunlop pot from Tom Bradshaw. The Dunlop pot works, but the "taper" is not the same and personally I hate it. Thus its an electronic VP for me.
_________________
GFI Ultra Keyless S-10 with pad (Black of course) TB202 amp, Hilton VP, Steelers Choice sidekick seat, SIT Strings
Cakewalk by Bandlab and Studio One V4.6 pro DAWs, MOTU Ultralite MK5 recording interface unit
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Carl Mesrobian


From:
Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 9:44 am    
Reply with quote

You might try one of these

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/precision-electronics-corporation/KA5041S28/KA5041S28-ND/523422
_________________
--carl

"The better it gets, the fewer of us know it." Ray Brown
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

George Kimery

 

From:
Limestone, TN, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 10:00 am     Volume pedal active or passive
Reply with quote

Carl, have you tried one of these? The shaft looks like it might be too short
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Carl Mesrobian


From:
Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 10:33 am    
Reply with quote

I have some, haven't installed yet , but I'm pretty sure they will work if I reverse the pulley on my Emmons pedal. (EDIT) I'll let you know - I have a dead AB that I can replace.
_________________
--carl

"The better it gets, the fewer of us know it." Ray Brown
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jack Stoner


From:
Kansas City, MO
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 10:55 am    
Reply with quote

The AB pot was a "modified" Logarithmic Audio taper. Most pots available are just a standard Logarithmic Audio taper pot. Longevity (lack) of the currently available pots is what brought about Tom Bradshaw choosing the Dunlop pot and to the new Goodrich Company's pots.

Lack of longevity is what happened to the Clarostat branded pots.


I've seen posts of different replacement volume pedal parts over the years. None equal the AB pots, either in the modified taper or longevity. There are NOS AB pots around that are logarithmic but not the modified logarithmic that was used in Volume Pedals.
_________________
GFI Ultra Keyless S-10 with pad (Black of course) TB202 amp, Hilton VP, Steelers Choice sidekick seat, SIT Strings
Cakewalk by Bandlab and Studio One V4.6 pro DAWs, MOTU Ultralite MK5 recording interface unit
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Carl Mesrobian


From:
Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 12:48 pm    
Reply with quote

I wonder how a linear taper would be.
_________________
--carl

"The better it gets, the fewer of us know it." Ray Brown
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 1:16 pm    
Reply with quote

Carl Mesrobian wrote:
I wonder how a linear taper would be.
Sounds like it is almost fully on at 1/3 open, and not much increase above that.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Carl Mesrobian


From:
Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 1:21 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks!
_________________
--carl

"The better it gets, the fewer of us know it." Ray Brown
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Dale Rottacker


From:
Walla Walla Washington, USA
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 2:50 pm    
Reply with quote

Until 3-4 years ago, I was still playing and old Sho~Bud pedal I’ve had since the 70’s with the Allen Bradley pot in it... the AB pot is still in good shape, but my ankle doesn’t like the height of the pedal anymore... I bought a couple of LP Goodrich 120’s and have tried a variety of the Pots mentioned here, and to me the new Dunlops are the best alternative available today, but still I don’t feel they stand up to those original AB’s that we loved so much, but no longer can get.... When it comes to pots, I don’t believe those AB’s have an equal.

Because of that, I ended up with a Telonic’s Multi Taper pedal and love it... Not HAVING to worry about a pot that starts scratching, plus the ability to change the taper to the old AB, (Which I use) or the Hilton, or Goodrich, is a very nice thing to have... Yes you need a power source, of which I’m not a fan, but hey... you can’t have everything Wink Rolling Eyes Wink
_________________
Dale Rottacker, Steelinatune™
*2021 MSA Legend, "Jolly Rancher" D10 10x9
*2021 Rittenberry, "The Concord" D10 9x9
*1977 Blue Sho-Bud Pro 3 Custom 8x6
https://msapedalsteels.com
http://rittenberrysteelguitars.com
https://www.telonics.com/index.php
https://www.p2pamps.com
https://www.quilterlabs.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Murray McDowall


From:
Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
Post  Posted 9 Jun 2018 4:16 pm    
Reply with quote

Plus 1 for the TELONICS Pedal.
After using an EMMONS Pedal since '77 and replacing numerous pots, and finding them these days is a problem, I purchased a TELONICS Pedal.
Could not be happier!! No pots to worry about! Power cord yes, but not really a problem when one has a TELONICS TCA 500c.
_________________
'99 Zum D-10 9x8,
'64 L Series "P" Bass,
Peavey Session 500,
Telonics TCA-500C & FP-100D pedal.
Steelers Choice Sidekick & Backrest.
Steelers Choice Seat.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 12:21 am    
Reply with quote

I got a Telonics to see if it was better than the Hilton, which it is, but the margin does not reflect the extra cost unless you're going to use all the extra features.

I keep it at home for practising/recording and I take the Hilton to the pub. This works because I can match the two pedals using the variable taper on the Telonics, so that feature at least I do use. They both use the same 24V DC power.

As the guy said who used to service my car "If it moves, it wears". A pot pedal will annoy you eventually and there is never a good moment for it to happen.
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 2:40 am    
Reply with quote

Ian Rae wrote:
As the guy said who used to service my car "If it moves, it wears".
… and if it doesn't move it most likely will collect dirt and develop drop-out spots. So, much can go wrong with pot-pedals, but I prefer them anyway.

As I always use a pre-VP buffer, active or passive VPs makes no difference in PU-load and tone. Also means I can use "low impedance VPs" – >10K<50Kohm suits my setup fine, and alter the taper to my liking without replacing pots. A little "pot grease" on the track reduces wear, and "burn-spots" are avoided by preventing DC discharge through the pot.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Douglas Schuch


From:
Valencia, Philippines
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 9:54 am    
Reply with quote

I've only played for about 7 years, and have always used a Hilton. I'm happy with it. I fooled around with an old Sho-Bud once, and that was enough to convince me I did not want a pot pedal - too complicated getting the pot in place and set up right! If I were to use a pot pedal, I'd opt for either the ones Doug Earnest at Stage One is building, or the Moyo. Probably the Stage One - very reasonable price, and no strings attached!
_________________
Bringing steel guitar to the bukid of Negros Oriental!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Greg Cutshaw


From:
Corry, PA, USA
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 1:40 pm    
Reply with quote

I have had pretty good luck using the Telonics, Goodrich pot petals with various pots and the Hilton pedal. My go to pedal is the Goodrich passive 120 with any of the conductive plastic pots producing the classic steel guitar tone. I've got over 8 years of use on my Dunlop pot and got 12 years of use on my previous AB pot. The AB pot did not fail catastrophically and just got noisy. Over that span of time, any type of pedal likely would have failed. Always have a spare pedal handy like the tiny Moyo unit! While I have noticed and measured the taper difference between the old Allen Bradley and the new Dunlop HotPots, either one works fine for me.


http://www.gregcutshaw.com/Telonics%20Pedal/Telonics%20Pedal.html

http://www.gregcutshaw.com/Hilton/Hilton.html

http://www.gregcutshaw.com/Goodrich%20LDR2/Goodrich%20LDR2.html

http://www.gregcutshaw.com/Goodrich%20120%20Pot/Goodrich%20120%20Pot.html

I think the new dual mode Goodrich Pot/Active pedal is worth a try as it seems to offer the best of both worlds. Perhaps someday someone will also design a pot pedal where the pot is a quick swap, user replaceable, plug in cartridge.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger

Paddy Long


From:
Christchurch, New Zealand
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 6:37 pm    
Reply with quote

Ive been using the Telonics volume pedals since they first hit the market, bought them at the Dallas steel show the first year that Dave had a booth there.

Prior to that I was a lifelong user of Goodrich pedals, both pot, and LDR2 versions -- quite frankly the Telonics pedal was, and still is light years ahead in every aspect IMO
_________________
14'Zumsteel Hybrid D10 9+9
08'Zumsteel Hybrid D10 9+9
94' Franklin Stereo D10 9+8
Telonics, Peterson, Steelers Choice, Benado, Lexicon, Red Dirt Cases.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Tucker Jackson

 

From:
Portland, Oregon, USA
Post  Posted 10 Jun 2018 7:23 pm    
Reply with quote

I recently migrated from my trusty, wonderful Hilton pedal to a pot pedal.

Why? I actually prefer the warm sound of a loaded pickup straight into a pot. And that EQ change that happens throughout the taper of a pot pedal? I prefer that too; it's not a bug, it's a feature. This is one of the details of the sound that drew me to steel in the first place and I couldn't figure out how to mimic it with an active pedal. So... if it ain't broke... pot pedal it is.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

George Kimery

 

From:
Limestone, TN, USA
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 9:24 am     Volume pedal active or passive
Reply with quote

Tucker, I'm with you. I bought a Hilton pedal and just never could get used to the sterile sound. Fast forward about 2 years, and I was having trouble getting the tone I wanted with a different amp. So, I ordered a 2nd Hilton. Same thing again. Sold it. I sort of feel there is something wrong with my ears, then I remind myself that Paul Franklin and Jay Dee Maness also use pot pedals, so maybe I am OK. It's always the same golden rule. Use what sounds best to you, isn't it.

I tried the Telonics at the Dallas show and liked the
feel and the taper. Soundwise, seemed to be pretty much like the Hilton. I didn't have a Hilton with me to compare. When I have some extra cash, I will try a Telonics as long as I have return privilege's. I love to experiment, otherwise how do I learn.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 2:40 pm    
Reply with quote

Tucker Jackson wrote:
it's not a bug, it's a feature

Engineering improvements can sterilise the instrument. The bassoon springs to mind (but then I have that sort of mind). The finger holes are traditionally drilled through the wood at funny angles - an acoustician's nightmare - and many years ago someone decided to apply a modern flute mechanism to sort it out. The result was something loud and in tune, but with none of the character of the original, which has been giving pleasure for hundreds of years.

If the varying impedance that your pickup sees is actually contributing to the expression in your playing, stick with your pot and let the geeks sneer! (Still like Telonics, though... Smile)
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Jonathan Shacklock


From:
London, UK
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 3:28 pm    
Reply with quote

I really don't want to give up my olld Sho Bud pedal. Does anyone know if the latest Goodrich pots (rebranded Dunlop?) have a different taper from the Dunlop hot potz as sold by Tom Bradshaw? From the marketing it sounds like they have modelled it on the old AB "J type" taper. It's a big investment to find out since they are apparently sold in fives:.
https://goodrichsoundcompany.com/product/goodrich-bare-pots/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Steve Spitz

 

From:
New Orleans, LA, USA
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 4:58 pm    
Reply with quote

Telonics. Sounds great with The Telonics amp, as well as with my twin.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 5:19 pm    
Reply with quote

Only potential drawback with pot-pedals (and no buffer) is that if one changes/replaces what directly follows it – cable and input impedance of first active stage, then the load on the PU and thereby its "tonal character" changes. So, once it sounds about right; keep it that way.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 11 Jun 2018 6:23 pm    
Reply with quote

I have tried various active pedals, but so far have never really warmed up to anything but old-school pot pedals. My favorites are my old Sho Bud pedals - I have three - two are pretty much pristine with original AB pots in good shape. I've had each of them for at least 10-15 years, and have never had to change the pots - but if I do, I picked up a couple of NOS ABs from John Widgren several years back. The third one needs to be refurbished. I also have a Franklin pedal to go with my Franklin along with some replacement pots that I got from Paul Sr., and a couple of Goodrich and Emmons pedals, as well as a few others. All of this cost me, over a period of years of looking around, about what a high-end volume pedal costs these days.

So I don't really need to think about anything else - if the darkening of the sound as I back off the pedal gets too much, then my Sarno Freeloader takes care of that completely. Some high-impedance pickups like the Freeloader, and the variable input impedance can be real useful. But more often than not, I just run straight from the guitar to the volume pedal.

Part of my issue is that I absolutely do not want to mess around with wiring power to my steel guitar volume pedal. It's one thing when it's on a powered pedal board, and I have one on my main guitar board. But diddling around with loose DC power wires under my feet is not something I'm gonna do.

I really like the idea of Jim P.'s Goodrich LoPro/HiPro active/passive capability and the option of battery power with long (he says 1000+ hours) battery life, as well as an option to externally power. That is discussed here - https://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=332166. I also like the idea of Telonics' multi-taper approach. I haven't tried either of these yet, but I'm sure these are good pedals. I may splurge for one of these at some point. But right now, it ain't broken so I'm not very motivated to fix it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 12 Jun 2018 7:54 am    
Reply with quote

Nothing lasts forever, be it a powered pedal or a pot pedal. My decision to stay with a pot pedal is based on decades of experience with things electronic. Sure, a powered pedal is great, but what happens when it quits? What is wrong with it? Can I fix it? Can anyone fix it? How long will it take? With a pot pedal, I know. With the fancy alternatives, I really don't.

I have my reasons, and you have your reasons. Use whatever you like; that's what I do. Cool
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 13 Jun 2018 12:54 am    
Reply with quote

The poll is missing "BOTH"

I have and use both, typically it's the Goodrich 120 POT Pedal as it is a no brainer to plug in and setup. I've used the same pedal now for 18 years and just changed the pot a few months ago for the first time.

I do also have a Goodrich LDR which is on my home studio rig plus I use it for any sessions I may do as it is totally silent with no hope whatsoever of the pot going bad and making noise .
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP