Guitar tone comparison
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
-
Darvin Willhoite
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Roxton, Tx. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Guitar tone comparison
I posted this as a reply in the "MSA Tone" thread, but in case you missed it there, here it is in it's own thread.
Here's a link to a demo song I threw together to see how some of my steel guitars sounded recorded. I used a different guitar on each of the two verses, and the two choruses. The guitars were a '75 Emmons P/P with original single coil pickups, a '75 MSA Classic with original single coil pickups, an MSA Millennium with Truetone single coils, and an MSA Studio Pro with Truetone single coils. I used an Acoustic Image Clarus 2R, Series III amp using the XLR direct out into the computer through a Tascam US144 interface. I also used a Boss RV-3 for reverb and delay. Anyone care to guess which guitar is playing which part?
(Don't pay any attention to my rough playing, just listen to the tone.)
Go here to download the song.
https://app.box.com/shared/yi7sn7ellb
Here's a link to a demo song I threw together to see how some of my steel guitars sounded recorded. I used a different guitar on each of the two verses, and the two choruses. The guitars were a '75 Emmons P/P with original single coil pickups, a '75 MSA Classic with original single coil pickups, an MSA Millennium with Truetone single coils, and an MSA Studio Pro with Truetone single coils. I used an Acoustic Image Clarus 2R, Series III amp using the XLR direct out into the computer through a Tascam US144 interface. I also used a Boss RV-3 for reverb and delay. Anyone care to guess which guitar is playing which part?
(Don't pay any attention to my rough playing, just listen to the tone.)
Go here to download the song.
https://app.box.com/shared/yi7sn7ellb
Last edited by Darvin Willhoite on 14 Oct 2016 3:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
-
Larry Bressington
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: 6 Jul 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Nebraska
- State/Province: Nebraska
- Country: United States
-
Darvin Willhoite
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Roxton, Tx. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Larry, go down to the box that says "STEEL DEMOS" and click on the "DOWNLOAD" button next to it. It will come up with another screen that has the identical box, click "DOWNLOAD" again. Then it comes up with a screen that has two boxes, click the "DOWNLOAD WITH LIMITED SPEED" box. It only takes a few seconds to download this file.
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
-
Larry Bressington
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: 6 Jul 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Nebraska
- State/Province: Nebraska
- Country: United States
-
richard burton
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: 23 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Britain
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
David Wright
- Posts: 5363
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Pilot Point ,Tx USA.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Darvin,
Very well done, Now, heres my take on this.
If you hadn't said you were using different steels while doing the recording I would have to say, didn't hear a difference, one must remember, just moving your hand towards or away from the changer will change your tone, I do it, being I play one neck, and try to get two different sounds from it with out changing my setting on my amp ... I do it with my "Hands"... and where I "pick" on the neck, for "me", I have two different styles of playing, 1. for the Country sound, 2. for the "Fatter" sound...
I don't want to open the tone thing, hands, bla`bla`` But... your hands play such a very big part of tone...and the eyes sometimes tells the ears what they hear, with out seeing, all you have is your ears....I think you proved a point..
This is my take on what I'm hearing, and mine alone..
Very well done, Now, heres my take on this.
If you hadn't said you were using different steels while doing the recording I would have to say, didn't hear a difference, one must remember, just moving your hand towards or away from the changer will change your tone, I do it, being I play one neck, and try to get two different sounds from it with out changing my setting on my amp ... I do it with my "Hands"... and where I "pick" on the neck, for "me", I have two different styles of playing, 1. for the Country sound, 2. for the "Fatter" sound...
I don't want to open the tone thing, hands, bla`bla`` But... your hands play such a very big part of tone...and the eyes sometimes tells the ears what they hear, with out seeing, all you have is your ears....I think you proved a point..
This is my take on what I'm hearing, and mine alone..
Last edited by David Wright on 30 Jul 2009 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Danny Bates
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: 5 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Fresno, CA. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Donny Hinson
- Posts: 21830
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
b0b
- Posts: 29079
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, CA, USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
There is so much echo and reverb that it's hard to isolate the actual guitar sound. The effects are as loud as the original signal. Still, I do hear the differences. I prefer the 3rd one by a good margin. The 2nd and 4th one sound very similar to me except that the 4th is louder.
I don't really know the difference between MSA models, so I'm not going to venture any guesses on what is what.
Real nice playing, Darvin. Good volume pedal technique.
I don't really know the difference between MSA models, so I'm not going to venture any guesses on what is what.
Real nice playing, Darvin. Good volume pedal technique.
-๐๐๐- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
-
Bill Duncan
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: 10 Jul 2008 1:53 pm
- Location: Lenoir, North Carolina, USA
- State/Province: North Carolina
- Country: United States
Darvin,
The main difference to me was in volume. It very well could have been the same guitar all the way through.
I thought the Emmons p/p was a humongus tone monster. I kept waiting for the tone of the p/p to overwhelm me, but alas it didn't.
Guess the p/p tone is kind of like ghosts. We know they're there, if only we could get proof.
1-Emmons P/P
2-'75 MSA Classic
3-MSA Studio Pro
4-MSA Millinium
The main difference to me was in volume. It very well could have been the same guitar all the way through.
I thought the Emmons p/p was a humongus tone monster. I kept waiting for the tone of the p/p to overwhelm me, but alas it didn't.
Guess the p/p tone is kind of like ghosts. We know they're there, if only we could get proof.
1-Emmons P/P
2-'75 MSA Classic
3-MSA Studio Pro
4-MSA Millinium
Last edited by Bill Duncan on 31 Jul 2009 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You can observe a lot just by looking
-
Scott Swartz
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: 23 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Brint Hannay
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: 23 Dec 2005 1:01 am
- Location: Maryland, USA
- State/Province: Maryland
- Country: United States
-
Jim Cohen
- Posts: 21848
- Joined: 18 Nov 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- State/Province: Pennsylvania
- Country: United States
First of all, I think your playing sounds great, Darvin. First time I've heard you play. Next, I think that all of the 4 guitars sound totally "acceptable" to my ear and with very little variation, certainly nothing very pronounced. If you hadn't told me it was four different guitars, my ear would readily have accepted them all as the same.
Having said that, I think the only one that sounds a bit different to me (if I try hard to hear a difference) is the last chorus, so I'm gonna guess that that's the pp and the others are all MSAs.
Having said that, I think the only one that sounds a bit different to me (if I try hard to hear a difference) is the last chorus, so I'm gonna guess that that's the pp and the others are all MSAs.
-
Chris Lucker
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 11 Aug 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, California USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
That's a huge problem in tone comparisons. Reverb especially skews results as it acts primarily on the upper frequencies. Even a small amount of reverb can mask a guitar's "real" tone. Echo is less troublesome, but still buries some things. Same with compression (and cheap compressors can REALLY screw up your tone!)There is so much echo and reverb that it's hard to isolate the actual guitar sound.
Tonal comparisons, to have any semblance of objectivity, need to be recorded "dry", using the same amp, cables, volume level and miking. The playing should also be a "neutral" as possible.
Last edited by Jim Sliff on 31 Jul 2009 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
-
Chris Lucker
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 11 Aug 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, California USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
Jim, I agree. I would like to hear the comparisons done DRY, at the eighth fret, strings 3-4-5 and then 4-5-6, then 6-8-10 with no pedals. Same with A and B. Then play the V7s. Nice and simple. You can even play each set twice at the sweet spot around the 26th fret and then closer to the bridge for comparison.
Then maybe add a simple scale for single note sounds
I could even do a comparison like this if someone would tab it out for me.
Chris
Then maybe add a simple scale for single note sounds
I could even do a comparison like this if someone would tab it out for me.
Chris
-
Chris Lucker
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 11 Aug 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, California USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
Jim, I agree. I would like to hear the comparisons done at the eighth fret, strings 3-4-5 and then 4-5-6, then 6-8-10 with no pedals. Same with A and B. Then play the V7s. Nice and simple. You can even play each set twice at the sweet spot around the 26th fret and then closer to the bridge for comparison.
I could even do a comparison like I describe if someone would tab it out for me.
Chris
I could even do a comparison like I describe if someone would tab it out for me.
Chris
Last edited by Chris Lucker on 31 Jul 2009 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Darvin Willhoite
Darvin you did a fine job and all PSG you used sounded great, but I think the whole thing would have sounded better if you would have used just any Sho-Bud.Willhoite I used a different guitar on each of the two verses, and the two choruses. The guitars were a '75 Emmons P/P with original single coil pickups, a '75 MSA Classic with original single coil pickups, an MSA Millennium with Truetone single coils, and an MSA Studio Pro with Truetone single coils.
-
Jim Sliff
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Lawndale California, USA
- State/Province: California
- Country: United States
Bo, what was your point?
The thread has to do with tonal differences between guitar; what playing "any Shobud" has to do with that is unclear, unless you are trying to say a Shobud's tone is superior to ANY other guitar - in which case the statement is both irrelevant and off topic.
The thread has to do with tonal differences between guitar; what playing "any Shobud" has to do with that is unclear, unless you are trying to say a Shobud's tone is superior to ANY other guitar - in which case the statement is both irrelevant and off topic.
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
-
Bo Legg
- Posts: 3665
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007 9:43 pm
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
-
Bill Duncan
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: 10 Jul 2008 1:53 pm
- Location: Lenoir, North Carolina, USA
- State/Province: North Carolina
- Country: United States
-
Darvin Willhoite
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Roxton, Tx. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Thanks guys for all of your comments. This was not meant to be a technical analysis of the tones of different guitars, it was just a sampling of what different guitars may sound like from a bandstand, to the average ears.
I used the RV-3 with the settings I would normally use when playing with a band, even though it might be a bit "wet" for some. I started playing back in the "Black Album" days when plate reverbs were pretty new, and producers and engineers used them to their full potential, and that sound kind of stuck with me. My Son runs our Studio and he is always on me about too much reverb. Oh well.....youngsters....
I'll post the guitars I used on which part sometime this weekend.
I used the RV-3 with the settings I would normally use when playing with a band, even though it might be a bit "wet" for some. I started playing back in the "Black Album" days when plate reverbs were pretty new, and producers and engineers used them to their full potential, and that sound kind of stuck with me. My Son runs our Studio and he is always on me about too much reverb. Oh well.....youngsters....
I'll post the guitars I used on which part sometime this weekend.
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
-
Darvin Willhoite
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Roxton, Tx. USA
- State/Province: -
- Country: United States
Uh Oh Bo, I'm busted. I love my MSA guitars, but I have a couple of Sho Buds in various re-build stages. When I get them finished, I may do the same thing comparing 'Buds with Williams, or Fessendens, or etc.
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.