Was it just me or did the Stones sound mix

Musical topics not directly related to steel guitar

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Bill Hatcher
Posts: 7306
Joined: 6 Nov 1998 1:01 am
Location: Atlanta Ga. USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bill Hatcher »

Charlie Watts played great and sounded good.

If you noticed there was a timer clock down on the floor with big red numbers so the band could see it. It was counting DOWN so I think that is where the jam came into play--just to give them a way to time the ending of their slot.

As for the playing--they sounded exactly like the Rolling Stones whether you like that or not. I personally dug the fact that they went out there and played LIVE!!!! What they did is what you got and that is the way it should always be done. That is tough no matter if you are the Stones or not.

User avatar
Terry Edwards
Posts: 1138
Joined: 13 Mar 2000 1:01 am
Location: Florida... livin' on spongecake...
State/Province: Florida
Country: United States

Post by Terry Edwards »

Well, they had a whole 20 minutes to install a stage and sound system. I can't understand it not being perfect! Image

The only one that sounded good was Aretha Franklin and I think she blew some windows out of Ford Arena!!

And, by the way, the Stones are supposed to sound bad. That's why they are the Stones!

Terry
Kevin Hatton
Posts: 8231
Joined: 3 Jan 2002 1:01 am
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Kevin Hatton »

Your right. Its The Stones. They're raw live. Thats the way they always sounded. I love Charlie watt's drumming.
User avatar
Dave Mudgett
Moderator
Posts: 10504
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 12:01 am
Location: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
State/Province: Pennsylvania
Country: United States

Post by Dave Mudgett »

Yeah, the mix was not great. We all know how famous stadium shows are for audiophile quality sound. Image

But it was a real live performance, warts and all. I remember ZZ Top lip synching a couple of years ago. It sounded like the Stones to me. I agree, Bill - Charlie sounded great.

It was not Ashlee Simpson. It was the Super Bowl. What else do you want? I'm sorry, we're not going to see Ray Price on the Super Bowl in our lifetime. Everyone's loss, I agree, but c'est la vie.
Rick Garrett
Posts: 1805
Joined: 13 May 2001 12:01 am
Location: Tyler, Texas
State/Province: Texas
Country: United States

Post by Rick Garrett »

I thought they sounded just terrible. The mix was rotten and about halfway through you could finally hear just how sour the guitar sounded. Then there's "mick" to listen to after that. Thank goodness for the mute button. They should team up with Ashley Simpson and do a tour somewhere in the middle east.

Rick
User avatar
Jim Peters
Posts: 1481
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Jim Peters »

They played poorly, blew some cues, blew an ending, and the sound was bad. I found it embarassing. They are caracatures of what they once were. Another vote for the mute button! JP
User avatar
Bill McCloskey
Posts: 8488
Joined: 5 Jan 2005 1:01 am
Location: Nanuet, NY
State/Province: New York
Country: United States

Post by Bill McCloskey »

"We all know how famous stadium shows are for audiophile quality sound."

No, I don't buy that. Sir Paul sounded great last year I thought (at least from a sound perspective - I never liked anything he did after the Beatles split).
Charley Adair
Posts: 609
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 1:01 am
Location: Maxwell, Texas, USA
State/Province: Texas
Country: United States

Post by Charley Adair »

The screamers on the field couldn't hear and didn't care what they sounded like. I sure thought Mick was saying "twy" on Satisfaction. Always thought it was "tRy"
Gavin Dunn
Posts: 173
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 1:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Gavin Dunn »

I though it was great, it took them about half of each song to pull it togeather....and when they did, it rocked, very hard.
As for why not get an American band instead....I have a hard time thinking of a more American sounding band than The Stones, save of course for AC/DC.
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21793
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Donny Hinson »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR><SMALL>quote:Yup, sound-wise, the average "bar-band" would eat 'em for lunch.

So...what does that mean, exactly? Would the "average bar band", have better gear, or a better soundman...or are you saying that the musicians would be better?</SMALL><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Geoff, I just said they sounded bad. Most people here agree. My niece went to see them last year in Virginia, and she said the same thing..."It was a fun show, but they didn't sound very good".

Yeah, yeah, I know they're rich and famous...even legendary. Yeah, they put on a big show, lotsa jumpin' around. But still, their <u>sound</u> has just never impressed me as it obviously has so many other millions of fans.

I take it you're a fan? Image

Good for you.
User avatar
Drew Howard
Posts: 3924
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: 48854
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Drew Howard »

More Motown, less Stones. Every Stones song was the same tempo. Charlie Watts and Mick were at least consistent, Ronnie and Keef were not. I hear Aretha made a lot of noise about including Motown music in the Stupor Bowl show. Good for her.

Drew

------------------
Image
<font size=1>Drew Howard - website - Fessenden guitars, 70's Fender Twin, etc.</font>


<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Drew Howard on 06 February 2006 at 03:18 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Geoff Brown
Posts: 467
Joined: 8 Mar 2001 1:01 am
Location: Nashvegas
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Geoff Brown »

Donny, I see what you're saying. The halftime show was what it was. Some would judge that 20 minutes as tho it was the definitive moment in their careers.
Nothing wrong with not being impressed with the Stones Image
I like the band, depending on which incarnation we're talking about. The early stuff with Brian Jones is spotty for me. I think what they were doing with R&B covers was great, and at that time it wasn't being done by everybody else. I liked some of that.
For me, the band was at it's best when Mick Taylor came on board. Probably the best musician that band has ever had. A young, shy kid who was (and still is) a helluva player. Albums like Let it Bleed and Sticky Fingers are great Stones records to me. The Gram Parsons influence at that time on Keef, and hard rockin' songs like Monkey Man and Can You Hear Me Knockin'...the mix of country-tinged, blues and straight-up R&R...not many bands could pull that off. They re-invented themselves during the Mick Taylor era. (when record companies still took risks with bands). I remember reading about the guys at Muscle Shoals not knowing what to expect before the sessions there, and how impressed they became once they started working with them.
For me...since Taylor's departure, it's been spotty again. Some of it's good, and some of it makes me wonder who I'm listening to.
kyle reid
Posts: 603
Joined: 28 Sep 1999 12:01 am
Location: Butte,Mt.usa
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by kyle reid »

I heard today, on a national sports station, that they did not get paid, did it for free! anyone hear the same?
User avatar
Archie Nicol R.I.P.
Posts: 6829
Joined: 25 Aug 2004 12:01 am
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Archie Nicol R.I.P. »

I was a fan when Mick Taylor was on lead. Ronnie is too Keithy.
User avatar
Bobby Lee
Site Admin
Posts: 14863
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bobby Lee »

They sounded good at Altamont. Haven't heard them since...
User avatar
Dave Grafe
Posts: 5309
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 12:01 am
Location: Hudson River Valley NY
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Dave Grafe »

I know for a fact that the technical people on site really were the best in the country (if not the world), but with a huge stage to set up, countless mults to get plugged in, about two or twelve hundred things can possibly go wrong and it quickly becomes a matter of which things WILL go wrong. I imagine that due to the timeline the band got told to get started before the system or the crew was ready, thus the missing first words and twenty-odd bars before the guitars were in the mix, I was pleased that the video switcher had the right guitar player on camera almost all of the time during solos, that's gotta be a first! And yes, the missing word after "you make a dead man..." was most assuredly removed by the network, not omitted by Mr. Jagger.
<SMALL>Charlie Watts played great and sounded good</SMALL>
A drummer like Charlie can buy a whole lot of time for the rest of the sound to get dialed in and it was never more apparent than at this show. As for the guitar PLAYING, I'm glad it wasn't me that had to run up there and play my guitar in a big hurried rush, surrounded by people in a panic trying to stay on time, with no opportunity to even take a deep breath before it's "Music GO!" And do you really think they could even hear themselves play over the screaming kids?

Aretha had a good point about local talent, all those great acts from Detroit and all, but she's about the only one who still lives anywhere near the Motor City any more, the rest of them took their bucks and ditched long ago.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Dave Grafe on 06 February 2006 at 05:45 PM.]</p></FONT>
Chip Fossa
Posts: 4366
Joined: 17 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Monson, MA, USA (deceased)
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Chip Fossa »

Another outlook that's been bantered around -
Why The Rollings Stones?

DETROIT - MOTOWN - BLACK MUSIC

How many hundreds of great black acts and musicians have been launched from Detroit?

Or, on the lighter side, "Mitch Ryder & The Detroit Wheels"?

Who in the h... picked The Rollings Stones?

Never cared much for the Stones, but "As Tears Go By", "Ruby Tuesday", and "Painted Black" were, and still are, among my favorite Stone's tunes. I guess, non-Stones in a way, as they're pretty mellow.

Just thought, some Detroit personna would have been more fitting for that half/time event.

User avatar
Terry Edwards
Posts: 1138
Joined: 13 Mar 2000 1:01 am
Location: Florida... livin' on spongecake...
State/Province: Florida
Country: United States

Post by Terry Edwards »

I grew up in Detroit but I don't think Iggy & The Stooges would have worked. Bob Seger - maybe. How about Ted Nugent? - He could have shot some arrows at some stufffed deers while playing Cat Scratch Fever! MC-5 could have played Kick Out The Jams - that would have kept the sensors busy! Kid Rock - too country!!!

They don't call it Detroit Rock City for nothing.

Motown is the only music that could work for a "family show" and we only got to see a small piece of it. Too bad.

Terry
Steve Hinson
Posts: 3988
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Hendersonville Tn USA
State/Province: Tennessee
Country: United States

Post by Steve Hinson »

b0b...were you at the Altamont show?

------------------
http://home.comcast.net/~steves_garage

Tucker Jackson
Posts: 1912
Joined: 8 Apr 2004 12:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
State/Province: Oregon
Country: United States

Post by Tucker Jackson »

b0b... say it ain't so...
User avatar
Bo Borland
Posts: 4012
Joined: 20 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: South Jersey -
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bo Borland »

I was wondering why only Charlie Watts has any grey hair.
User avatar
Alvin Blaine
Posts: 2250
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 12:01 am
Location: Picture Rocks, Arizona, USA
State/Province: Arizona
Country: United States

Post by Alvin Blaine »

As for the censorship of the songs, apparently they set that up before the show.
Stones Censorship Story
Mike Brown
Posts: 5027
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Meridian, Mississippi USA
State/Province: Mississippi
Country: United States

Post by Mike Brown »

I'll have to agree with Steve Hinson on this. I thought that "Get Your Ya's Ya's Out" was one of the worst live albums ever released when I first heard it a few decades back. But, in retrospect I now think it is one of the 'best' live albums ever released. That album and Wet Willie's Drippin' Wet album.

The Stones are the The Stones. The best rock and roll band, and they still use the basic Chuck Berry licks in many of their songs. I hope that I'm still rockin' in my '60's!.............and not in a chair.


User avatar
David L. Donald
Posts: 13700
Joined: 17 Feb 2003 1:01 am
Location: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by David L. Donald »

<SMALL>I think they just wanted to make sure that we knew they were playing live, because NOBODY would ever pre-record tracks that sounded that bad.</SMALL>
Wellllll....Ashlee Simpson??
User avatar
Bob Hoffnar
Posts: 9488
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Tx
State/Province: Texas
Country: United States

Post by Bob Hoffnar »

I loved it ! They just got up there and had good time playing some rock and roll.

------------------
Bob
upcoming gigs
My Website

Image