Control by Cable-within-Tube

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

Jim Palenscar
Posts: 6021
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Oceanside, Calif, USA

Post by Jim Palenscar »

Ed Packard has been working on this idea for years~
User avatar
chris ivey
Posts: 12703
Joined: 8 Nov 1998 1:01 am
Location: california (deceased)

Post by chris ivey »

as for the drone concept....wouldn't this allow you to have your steel at the venue and play it from your living room couch. you know, a little audio feed from the gig...yeah.
here's to the future, and the demise of soul!
Will Cowell
Posts: 388
Joined: 23 Jan 2008 1:02 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Post by Will Cowell »

Les Cargill suggested there would be a need for a lot of servos because some guitars have about 30 pulls. That's not really a problem: you have one servo per string. You command the pitch desired shift and the servo responds by changing the string tension until you hit the target note. It doesn't matter how many changes: there will only ever be a need for one servo per string.

My design used miniature motors driving screwjacks. The motors were 18mm diameter, 5 each side, 9.5mm string spacing - no problem. You don't need to program "feel". The "feel" of a conventional PSG derives from the opposition to movement from springs and the string itself - another kind of elastic spring. You can put springs on a servo PSG to simulate the same opposition.
Williams 700 series keyless U12,
Sierra keyless U14, Eezzee-Slide & BJS bars
Moth-eaten old Marshall 150 combo
Roland Cube 80XL, Peterson Strobo+HD,
EarthQuaker Despatch Master for reverb / delay
User avatar
chris ivey
Posts: 12703
Joined: 8 Nov 1998 1:01 am
Location: california (deceased)

Post by chris ivey »

who's gonna pick the strings, you ask?
rc robots with servos and a cowboy hat.
Jack Aldrich
Posts: 1004
Joined: 30 Apr 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Post by Jack Aldrich »

[quote="Alan Brookes"] I believe the reason that MultiKords were built with all the pedals on the left, in a semicircle, was because of the difficulty of angling the cables from any other place. This could be obviated by the use of bicycle brake cables.

quote]Alan - As I learned the history of the pedal steel from Jeff Newman, Winnie Winston and others, I was told that the impetus behind pedals, at first, was to accomodate retuning and reduce the number of necks on lap steel guitars of the time. Before split pedals, pedal pulls changed whole chrods - e.g., pushing pedal "A" moved the steel from an E to an A tuning. So, until Bud Isaacs recorded "Slowly" with Webb Pierce, nobody moved pedals during a song.
Jack Aldrich
Carter & ShoBud D10's
D8 & T8 Stringmaster
Rickenbacher B6
3 Resonator guitars
Asher Alan Akaka Special SN 6
Canopus D8
User avatar
Walter Killam
Posts: 523
Joined: 9 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Nebraska, USA

Post by Walter Killam »

I've toyed with the idea of using punchcards like the ones used in a jacquard loom. 1 card to set the base tuning, then a second card to configure the pedals. I may get to prototyping sometime in the next decade or so!
Mostly junque with a few knick-knacks that I really can't do without!
Les Cargill
Posts: 774
Joined: 1 Jan 2014 7:09 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, Ok, USA

Post by Les Cargill »

Will Cowell wrote:Les Cargill suggested there would be a need for a lot of servos because some guitars have about 30 pulls. That's not really a problem: you have one servo per string. You command the pitch desired shift and the servo responds by changing the string tension until you hit the target note. It doesn't matter how many changes: there will only ever be a need for one servo per string.

My design used miniature motors driving screwjacks. The motors were 18mm diameter, 5 each side, 9.5mm string spacing - no problem. You don't need to program "feel". The "feel" of a conventional PSG derives from the opposition to movement from springs and the string itself - another kind of elastic spring. You can put springs on a servo PSG to simulate the same opposition.

Yeah, Will - I'm thinking you'd still need a changer, but you've seem to be done gone past me on that detail :)

Even then my math is off - you'd need at most two servos per string *with* a changer. If there's some way to get a servo to do both lowers and raises that cuts that in half. I bet that's doable, even with the little block ones the guy with the servo Tele bender used.

Your screw jack idea seems better, though.
Stephen Williams
Posts: 257
Joined: 4 Jun 2013 7:11 pm
Location: from Wales now in Berkeley,Ca, USA

Post by Stephen Williams »

I'm building a psg with cables.

Re 2 changes per pedal: use 2 cables on the pedal. You can use pulleys etc etc but seems simpler to just use 2 runs from the pedal.

Seems like it would be hard to terminate the cable sheath at the pedal so i was thinking of running bare cable from pedal to deck then using cables ending up in rods.
Stephen Williams
Posts: 257
Joined: 4 Jun 2013 7:11 pm
Location: from Wales now in Berkeley,Ca, USA

Post by Stephen Williams »

I'm building a psg with cables.

Re 2 changes per pedal: use 2 cables on the pedal. You can use pulleys etc etc but seems simpler to just use 2 runs from the pedal.

Seems like it would be hard to terminate the cable sheath at the pedal so i was thinking of running bare cable from pedal to deck then using cables ending up in rods.
User avatar
Kevin LaFond
Posts: 184
Joined: 21 May 2012 10:21 pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: Pedals on a G&L Fender

Post by Kevin LaFond »

Dennis Brown wrote:I made this in the early 80's. Every thing was made of Lexon except the bike cables and hardware. It worked very well and was pretty quick on the tone return after releasing the pedals. It was a fun project. Dennis
Image
Image
Dennis, do you still have this guitar?
PRP Mullen SD-10, Fender 4x10 Deville, Telecaster and Stratocaster
Dennis Brown
Posts: 1270
Joined: 6 Mar 2009 5:22 pm
Location: Gowen, Mi. USA

G&l

Post by Dennis Brown »

I do not have this anymore. Sure wish I did.