The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic looking for ideas for a tone control
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  looking for ideas for a tone control
Will Slack

 

From:
Texas, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 9:22 am    
Reply with quote

My Fender Dual 8 is just a hair too bright with my new amp (deluxe reverb with bright cap removed and treble all the way down!) I could roll off the tone control on the guitar, but I like using that for the 'boo-wah' sound. I know I could use an EQ pedal, but I am always trying to simplify things and lighten my load. Also, I don't want to alter the amp because it sounds great for other guitars as is. So, I'm looking for suggestions.

Could I potentially make a tone control integrated into a guitar cable? Or a very small, passive box? I could see this just having a small trim pot, or maybe even a fixed value that works for this guitar/amp combo. I have decent soldering skills, so if anyone has a good idea how to design it, I imagine I could put it together.

THANKS.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jerry Overstreet


From:
Louisville Ky
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 10:06 am    
Reply with quote

Search around here for the Goodrich Match Box that will snap on to your guitar leg. They've been around a long time and often you can pick up one of the early ones for a reasonable price. Just be sure it's one that has the tone control built in.
View user's profile Send private message

John Limbach

 

From:
Billings, Montana, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 10:09 am    
Reply with quote

Check the capacitor in the dual pro. If it's a paper type it's so dried out that it's more of a resistor. Others disagree but my personal philosophy is that, with the exception of mica types, any cap old enough to draw Social Security should be retired on general principles. Replace it with a .047mfd, the modern value for the old .05. If that doesn't help, experiment with changing the value to roll off more highs.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 10:10 am    
Reply with quote

Jerry has the right idea. Very Happy

Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Steve Vroman

 

From:
Albany, NY
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 10:47 am    
Reply with quote

I made a small passive box that I put on my pedalboard, it could just as easily be mounted to a leg of my steel(I'm not home or I'd take a picture) It's just a one knob tone control, wired similar to a Telecaster tone control
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Will Slack

 

From:
Texas, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 12:13 pm    
Reply with quote

Well, the goodrich unit could fit the bill, but I still wonder if there's a smaller DIY option. I'm picturing a box with a 1/4" plug coming out of it, almost like those old dan armstrong orange squeezers, and a 1/4" jack, then like Steve mentioned, just a tele tone control inside.

Oh, and I'll check the capacitor too.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Brooks Montgomery


From:
Idaho, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 2:06 pm    
Reply with quote

Jerry Overstreet wrote:
Search around here for the Goodrich Match Box that will snap on to your guitar leg. They've been around a long time and often you can pick up one of the early ones for a reasonable price. Just be sure it's one that has the tone control built in.


Is the Matchbox an improvement if you play thru a Black Box with the tone knob? Or is it somewhat redundant?

I use a passive (pot) Goodrich pedal.
_________________
A banjo, like a pet monkey, seems like a good idea at first.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jerry Overstreet


From:
Louisville Ky
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 2:15 pm    
Reply with quote

Yes, Brooks. If you are using a Black Box, the Match Box would be redundant and/or unnecessary as you suspected.

Will, if you're knowledgeable about building such things, you could pick up an enclosure like a Hammond 1590A "twinkie" size or a square #1590LB and use it to build a tone control with the proper components. www.tubesandmore.com has an assortment of boxes like these.
View user's profile Send private message

Brooks Montgomery


From:
Idaho, USA
Post  Posted 30 Aug 2019 2:23 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks Jerry!
_________________
A banjo, like a pet monkey, seems like a good idea at first.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Roman Sonnleitner


From:
Vienna, Austria
Post  Posted 31 Aug 2019 12:41 am    
Reply with quote

Just wire up a cable with this:

https://www.neutrik.com/en/product/np2rx-timbre
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 31 Aug 2019 3:58 am    
Reply with quote

Yes, you could make an inline tone control, or just add a small value cap across the input. I don't know what kind of cables you're using, but you should NOT be using low-capacity cables (like George-Ls) if having too much treble is an issue. The problem you're experiencing can sometimes be eliminated just by using a longer or cheaper cable.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Murray McDowall


From:
Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
Post  Posted 31 Aug 2019 8:48 pm    
Reply with quote

Hey Roman, what a great idea!!
I ordered one today.
Many thanks,
Murray.
_________________
'99 Zum D-10 9x8,
'64 L Series "P" Bass,
Peavey Session 500,
Telonics TCA-500C & FP-100D pedal.
Steelers Choice Sidekick & Backrest.
Steelers Choice Seat.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Keith Hilton

 

From:
248 Laurel Road Ozark, Missouri 65721
Post  Posted 3 Sep 2019 6:59 pm    
Reply with quote

Most guitar tone controls are first order filters. The biggest problem with any kind of tone control filter is the impedance the tone control sees on the output. Low impedance and the tone control will not work correctly. There are many types of second order filters that work great, but they all need to see really high impedance. The drop off per decade is much greater as the order of the filter goes up. Even a 4th order filter is not that hard to build. Last year I got some great experience building filters for a violin manufacturer who was using different kinds of piezo pickups. It was a difficult job taming the highs. The arrangement had to be special because the piezo pickup had to see high impedance.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Keith Hilton

 

From:
248 Laurel Road Ozark, Missouri 65721
Post  Posted 3 Sep 2019 7:01 pm    
Reply with quote

Most guitar tone controls are first order filters. The biggest problem with any kind of tone control filter is the impedance the tone control sees on the output. Low impedance and the tone control will not work correctly. There are many types of second order filters that work great, but they all need to see really high impedance. The drop off per decade is much greater as the order of the filter goes up. Even a 4th order filter is not that hard to build. Last year I got some great experience building filters for a violin manufacturer who was using different kinds of piezo pickups. It was a difficult job taming the highs. The arrangement had to be special because the piezo pickup had to see high impedance.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 4 Sep 2019 12:20 am    
Reply with quote

maybe your solution is right in front of your nose ?





_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Will Slack

 

From:
Texas, USA
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2019 8:56 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks for the input, everyone. Roman, that product is exactly the kind of thing I was hoping existed. I may have to order one to try out, though I think I have solved the issue another way.

In looking through old posts about the Dual Pro, I found this thread in which the discussion gets to the fact that there were two ways the dual pros were wired up. It seems everyone considers the 'alternate hookup' (as listed here) to be superior. I moved the one wire to change mine to the alternate hookup and it is a great improvement. The guitar is still bright, but the tone knob is so much more useful now. I can do the boo-wah sound and still land the tone knob in pleasant territory. And as an added bonus, I can turn down the vol pot without things getting muddy. This alternate hookup should be standard!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jerry Overstreet


From:
Louisville Ky
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2019 11:00 am    
Reply with quote

That's great Will! Your detective work paid dividends and you don't have to deal with another wart on your guitar leg etc.

I expect others will be following your link for this information for their guitars.
View user's profile Send private message

Cartwright Thompson


Post  Posted 8 Sep 2019 9:21 am    
Reply with quote

You might like a Fender Volume/Tone pedal. Find an old one, the reissues aren’t very good.
View user's profile Send private message

Larry Behm


From:
Mt Angel, Or 97362
Post  Posted 8 Sep 2019 9:27 am    
Reply with quote

Do you have an amp designed for steel in addition to the deluxe designed for guitar?

Any graphic EQ pedal should do the job.
_________________
'70 D10 Black fatback Emmons PP, Hilton VP, BJS bars, Boss GE-7 for Dobro effect, Zoom MS50G, Flamma Reverb, Planet Wave cables, Quilter 202 Toneblocks, Telonics 15” speakers.

Phone: 971-219-8533
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Patrick Huey


From:
Nacogdoches, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 16 Sep 2019 6:50 am    
Reply with quote

Murray McDowall wrote:
Hey Roman, what a great idea!!
I ordered one today.
Many thanks,
Murray.

Murray,
How much was it? I didn’t see prices listed on the site
_________________
Pre RP Mullen D10 8/7, Zum 3/4, Carter S-10 3/4, previous Cougar SD-10 3/4 & GFI S-10 3/4, Fender Steel King, 2 Peavey Session 500's, Peavey Nashville 400, Boss DD-3, Profex-II, Hilton Digital Sustain, '88 Les Paul Custom,Epiphone MBIBG J-45, Fender Strat & Tele's, Takamine acoustics, Marshall amps, Boss effects, Ibanez Tube Screamer, and it all started with an old cranky worn out Kay acoustic you could slide a Mack truck between the strings and fretboard on!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Patrick Huey


From:
Nacogdoches, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 16 Sep 2019 6:58 am    
Reply with quote

Keith Hilton wrote:
Most guitar tone controls are first order filters. The biggest problem with any kind of tone control filter is the impedance the tone control sees on the output. Low impedance and the tone control will not work correctly. There are many types of second order filters that work great, but they all need to see really high impedance. The drop off per decade is much greater as the order of the filter goes up. Even a 4th order filter is not that hard to build. Last year I got some great experience building filters for a violin manufacturer who was using different kinds of piezo pickups. It was a difficult job taming the highs. The arrangement had to be special because the piezo pickup had to see high impedance.

Kieth my vote still goes for your original Hilton Digital Sustain box. It has both a gain AND tone control and I’ve preferred it over the Matchbox by far. I can tame the highs in my pre RP Mullen to perfection and to suit the needs of the song I’m attempting to butcher and not have to adjust the amp. Buffered circuitry for no signal loss as well. I wish you still made them w/ the tone control knob.
_________________
Pre RP Mullen D10 8/7, Zum 3/4, Carter S-10 3/4, previous Cougar SD-10 3/4 & GFI S-10 3/4, Fender Steel King, 2 Peavey Session 500's, Peavey Nashville 400, Boss DD-3, Profex-II, Hilton Digital Sustain, '88 Les Paul Custom,Epiphone MBIBG J-45, Fender Strat & Tele's, Takamine acoustics, Marshall amps, Boss effects, Ibanez Tube Screamer, and it all started with an old cranky worn out Kay acoustic you could slide a Mack truck between the strings and fretboard on!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Murray McDowall


From:
Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
Post  Posted 16 Sep 2019 3:06 pm    
Reply with quote

G’Day Patrick,

It works pretty well, and cost AU $30 (30 Aussie dollars).
Turn C/W to cut the highs though, in 4 steps.
Good luck.
Murray.
_________________
'99 Zum D-10 9x8,
'64 L Series "P" Bass,
Peavey Session 500,
Telonics TCA-500C & FP-100D pedal.
Steelers Choice Sidekick & Backrest.
Steelers Choice Seat.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Marc Jenkins


From:
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Post  Posted 16 Sep 2019 10:27 pm    
Reply with quote

Murray McDowall wrote:
G’Day Patrick,

It works pretty well, and cost AU $30 (30 Aussie dollars).
Turn C/W to cut the highs though, in 4 steps.
Good luck.
Murray.


Murray, does it sound approximately like a traditional tone knob at said 4 spots?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Murray McDowall


From:
Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
Post  Posted 17 Sep 2019 11:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Yes Patrick, it has a fair bit of treble cut in advancing stages from the second of the four positions of the switch. The first position has no cut at all.
Give it a try, it sounds about right on the second pos with the back C6 neck.
All the best,
Murray.
_________________
'99 Zum D-10 9x8,
'64 L Series "P" Bass,
Peavey Session 500,
Telonics TCA-500C & FP-100D pedal.
Steelers Choice Sidekick & Backrest.
Steelers Choice Seat.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP