| Author |
Topic: line6 xt vs hd300 for direct in |
Steven Welborn
From:
Ojai,CA USA
|
Posted 19 Jul 2015 9:25 pm |
|
| I'm trying to settle on one of these for direct in recording for best sound options when unable to mic an amp. Anyone have experience with the hd series, better sound than the XT? |
|
|
|
Jack Stoner
From:
Kansas City, MO
|
Posted 20 Jul 2015 2:19 am
|
|
I had a POD HD and returned it. Didn't like the sound or the effects. I've got an XT and X3 and use the X3 live, and direct sometimes.
The XT and X3 can use the same "tones" (what line 6 calls programs). I like the X3 better as it has a couple extra options.
Live I only use my POD's for effects only, no amp sims. I have one preamp program I use when I record direct with it.
_________________
GFI Ultra Keyless S-10 with pad (Black of course) TB202 amp, Hilton VP, Steelers Choice sidekick seat, SIT Strings
Cakewalk by Bandlab and Studio One V4.6 pro DAWs, MOTU Ultralite MK5 recording interface unit |
|
|
|
Ian Worley
From:
Sacramento, CA
|
Posted 20 Jul 2015 1:19 pm
|
|
| I don't know anything about the xt series, but the HD series have a USB interface with an ASIO driver so you can connect directly to your DAW, all digital from the input onward. I used an HD desktop with a Black Box in front for practice and for long-distance recording when I was living in an apartment and couldn't play loud enough to mic an amp, I got decent results. It's stereo so you can split the signal path and record one channel with POD effects, one dry. I think the HD300 may have a more limited selection of amp models and effects than the HD500, Pro or desktop, but not sure. |
|
|
|
