The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Dobro string spacing... help, please
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Dobro string spacing... help, please
James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 24 Jan 2015 11:01 am    
Reply with quote

I have a metal body round-neck dobro from the mid '70s. I'd mainly played it lap style with the strings jacked up, although it's actually been in storage for years. The round neck doesn't really like the tension with the strings raised and in any case, was badly damaged some years ago in a flood.

So, I'm going to have a new square neck made for it by a local luthier. Which raises the question of string spacing at the nut. I figured I'd go with whatever has become standard for square necks and looked on some manufacturer websites for specs. Scheerhorn states nut width 1.875". Taking that literally as nut width, not string spacing, I'm not sure exactly what the Scheerhorn spacing is. Paul Beard, somewhere, mentions 8.5mm string to string spacing. Either of the above would no doubt be fine. Coincidentally, my two favorite lap steels are almost exactly 1.875" overall spacing from 1st to 6th string, at the nut.

Since I've played the round neck dobro in past with quite narrow spacing, but feel more comfortable with the wider spacing on the electric laps, I'll go for wider. Just not sure how much wider. Anyway, thought I'd solicit comment from dobro players here. Do the specs I cited sound right? Any Scheerhorn or Beard owners wish the spacing was different?

Thanks for any help!
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Howard Parker


From:
Maryland
Post  Posted 24 Jan 2015 12:28 pm    
Reply with quote

The Beard spec is:

6 str spacing at nut = 8.75mm
spacing at bridge =11.5mm

Nut width = 1 7/8

Pretty much the standard with new builds. Great note separation.

h
_________________
Howard Parker

03\' Carter D-10
70\'s Dekley D-10
52\' Fender Custom
Many guitars by Paul Beard
Listowner Resoguit-L
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 24 Jan 2015 2:12 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks, Howard, for your input.

Just to clarify, the 8.75mm you cited is center to center string spacing? Otherwise, 8.75mm measured edge of string to edge of string, the math doesn't work if it's to fit on a 1 7/8" wide nut. Even so, seems like the outer strings will be awful close to the edges of the nut.

Or did I screw up the calculations? Math, not my strong point.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Howard Parker


From:
Maryland
Post  Posted 24 Jan 2015 2:17 pm    
Reply with quote

James Hartman wrote:
Thanks, Howard, for your input.

Just to clarify, the 8.75mm you cited is center to center string spacing?


Correct, center to center.
h
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 24 Jan 2015 2:54 pm    
Reply with quote

Howard Parker wrote:
James Hartman wrote:
Thanks, Howard, for your input.

Just to clarify, the 8.75mm you cited is center to center string spacing?


Correct, center to center.
h


Thanks!
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 26 Jan 2015 8:21 am    
Reply with quote

Meant to ask, also, what's typical string height, at the nut, on a Beard?
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Howard Parker


From:
Maryland
Post  Posted 26 Jan 2015 8:34 am    
Reply with quote

The height is determined by the coverplate's palm rest.

Paul makes his own coverplates with a very high palm rest. Even with that height the action is high enough that only one string at a time can be removed when changing a set.

So, the short answer is, with your hardware, high enough that the strings don't touch the palm rest when the guitar is at pitch or- as high as you can get it. Very Happy

h
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Mark Eaton


From:
Sonoma County in The Great State Of Northern California
Post  Posted 26 Jan 2015 10:59 am    
Reply with quote

James asked the typical string height on a Beard (squareneck).

Just a guess, but I'm thinking of 3/8" at the nut.

There might be a variance among different builders of squareneck resonators of about 1/8" - I'm thinking the majority use a string height at the nut of 3/8" but I have come across some guitars that are 1/2" height at the nut.
_________________
Mark
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Greg Booth


From:
Anchorage, AK, USA
Post  Posted 26 Jan 2015 7:08 pm    
Reply with quote

My Scheerhorn string height is 7/16" at the nut. I have played at least one Appalachian with 1/2" high action at the nut. I find 7/16" to be ideal and think that many modern dobros are about that high.
_________________
Greg
Kathy Kallick Band
www.youtube.com/user/aksliderdobro
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Mark Eaton


From:
Sonoma County in The Great State Of Northern California
Post  Posted 26 Jan 2015 8:35 pm    
Reply with quote

7/16" - must be the Scheerhorn 'tweener size, like having all those different waist size on Levi's at the department store.
_________________
Mark
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 27 Jan 2015 6:31 am    
Reply with quote

Yes, my question was specific to height at the nut.

Obviously so long as it's high enough the strings aren't hitting the fingerboard under bar pressure, it works. But I imagined builders had arrived at a more or less standard height that seems optimal without creating too much leveraged stress on the instrument.

The 3/8" - 7/16" cited here is pretty much what I'd expected.

At the other end, as Howard pointed out, there are predetermining factors. Although, no palm rest on this instrument; I removed it years ago to facilitate palm muting.

Thanks, guys, for all the input.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 16 Mar 2015 7:19 am    
Reply with quote

Soon to drop off my dobro for its make-over. Final review of the specs I've arrived at; and thanks for info offered here.

I wanted to revisit the issue of string height at the nut. 3/8" and 7/16" were suggested as modern standard height. 1/16" more or less probably doesn't make a very noticeable difference. But, I thought I'd ask whether any of you guys feel strongly that the higher or lower spec is more desirable.

Thanks!
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Dave Thier


From:
Fairhope, Alabama, USA
Post  Posted 17 Mar 2015 6:05 am    
Reply with quote

Greg Booth wrote:
My Scheerhorn string height is 7/16" at the nut. I have played at least one Appalachian with 1/2" high action at the nut. I find 7/16" to be ideal and think that many modern dobros are about that high.


I would go with 7/16 as Greg suggests. I think my Beard and Clinesmith are both 7/16.

Correction, the Clinesmith is 3/8 and the Beard more like 1/2 on a quick measurement.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 17 Mar 2015 7:08 am    
Reply with quote

Dave Thier wrote:
Greg Booth wrote:
My Scheerhorn string height is 7/16" at the nut. I have played at least one Appalachian with 1/2" high action at the nut. I find 7/16" to be ideal and think that many modern dobros are about that high.


I would go with 7/16 as Greg suggests. I think my Beard and Clinesmith are both 7/16.

Correction, the Clinesmith is 3/8 and the Beard more like 1/2 on a quick measurement.



Dave, thanks for your comments. Had me convinced, for a minute there, of 7/16.

But seriously, I'm confident either end of that range will be just fine. Mostly curious whether anyone feels strongly that slightly higher or slightly lower is better, and why they feel that way.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Dave Thier


From:
Fairhope, Alabama, USA
Post  Posted 17 Mar 2015 11:02 am    
Reply with quote

James, A builder could give you a good discussion on this topic, but it seems that 7/16 in. seems to be the sweet spot. If you found out later you wanted 3/8 for some reason, it could be lowered.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 17 Mar 2015 11:38 am    
Reply with quote

Dave Thier wrote:
James, A builder could give you a good discussion on this topic, but it seems that 7/16 in. seems to be the sweet spot. If you found out later you wanted 3/8 for some reason, it could be lowered.


Oh, absolutely; and that's no problem. I've made more nuts and bridge saddles than I can count - used to be a repair tech.

Just figured I'd research, try to get it "right" from the start. The luthier who's making the new neck doesn't normally build this type of guitar, so he doesn't have a strong opinion. 3/8 is certainly ample clearance for comfortable playing and to accommodate a capo.

I suppose any change in the strings break-over angle at the bridge (and different height at the nut alters that, ever so slightly) can effect tone. Variations of 1/16" at the nut having any noticeable tonal effect... I doubt it. On the other hand, raising or lowering the stop tailpiece in relation to the bridge on, say, a Gibson Les Paul does have a significant effect. Of course the closeness of bridge and tailpiece in that instance creates a much more dramatic change in break-over angle. These questions are interesting to me, but in this case probably not of great practical importance.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP