The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Mathy revelation
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Mathy revelation
Allan Haley

 

From:
British Columbia, Canada
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2016 9:59 am    
Reply with quote

Hi steelers.

I was practicing harmonized scales this morning and hit on a mathy connection between the tunings of some pairs of strings.

The 3 and 4 strings are tuned the same as the 6 and 8 strings- both being G# and E, respectively. Interestingly, 3/4 and 6/8 are equivalent fractions.

The same is true with strings 4 and 5 and strings 8 and 10. Both pairs are tuned E and B, respectively. 4/5 and 8/10 also are equivalent fractions.

I think I will find this helpful as I struggle to get more comfortable playing this instrument- it certainly appeals to the math nerd in me.

Al
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2016 1:13 pm     Re: Mathy revelation
Reply with quote

Allan Haley wrote:
I think I will find this helpful

Clearly you will. It's a shame that there's no deep significance in it, as string 4 was string 2 before Buddy Emmons, and string 1 before Ralph Mooney.

But finding patterns is what separates men from beasts (and mathematicians from mere men) Smile
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

John Goux

 

From:
California, USA
Post  Posted 11 Sep 2016 10:35 pm    
Reply with quote

I'd noticed that, too. I wondered whether the architects of our E9 tuning were aware of this, and had planned the tuning with this in mind.
For an added math angle...the frequencies of our higher octaves strings, in Hz, are double that of the lower. Similar to 3-6, 4-8, 5-10. Don't ask me the frequencies, but I think octaves are twice the Hz.
J
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jeremy Threlfall


From:
now in Western Australia
Post  Posted 11 Sep 2016 11:42 pm    
Reply with quote

http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html
_________________
Luke Drifter on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/ralwaybell
https://www.facebook.com/jeremy.j.threlfall
http://ralwaybell.bandcamp.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 12 Sep 2016 1:09 am    
Reply with quote

John Goux wrote:
I wondered whether the architects of our E9 tuning were aware of this, and had planned the tuning with this in mind.

Sorry to disappoint, but the string numbers are arbitrary and depend how many strings are on the guitar. But you're quite right about an octave being a doubling of frequency. Most musical cultures - even the ones that don't have scales - recognise this 2:1 ratio as meaningful, and the other relationships between notes which we regard as building blocks are based on simple fractions (3rd = 5:4, 4th = 4:3, 5th = 3:2, 6th = 5:3 etc.) although in practice they are usually modified to the values in Jeremy's chart for reasons which have been elaborated many times on here.
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Tim Russell


From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 12 Sep 2016 2:11 am    
Reply with quote

I'm not sure if I would read too much into the 3/4 - 6/8 string relation...sometimes things just work out as coincidence. That being said, music is definitely purely mathematically based.

I have always been intrigued by the use of math/time signatures employed by the band "Rush" - one of their most famous pieces being "Y-Y-Z" that is completely based on math/numbers, played in a time signature of 5/4.

I used to have a site bookmarked that explained the whole YYZ thing in detail, but I cannot seem to locate it at the moment. It is a very interesting read for math nerds, lol.
_________________
Sierra Crown D-10
View user's profile Send private message

Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 12 Sep 2016 9:54 am    
Reply with quote

I am sceptical of too much mathematics being injected artificially into music, like a hormone.

When we hear something pleasing, the explanation is mathematical, but just because something is heavy on the math doesn't mean it sounds musical at all.

A lot of 20th concert music was conceived by numbers, but the inner workings are lost on the human ear.
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Michael Hummel


From:
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 12 Sep 2016 10:53 am    
Reply with quote

I don't know EVERYTHING about Rush nor YYZ, but here's a few things I CAN tell you:

1. I grew up in Willowdale (Toronto) 4 blocks from Geddy Lee and Alex Lifeson

2. (C)YYZ is the international aeronautical designation for the Toronto Pearson International Airport

3. The Morse code for the letters Y-Y-Z is -.-- -.-- --.. and you can hear the band play this pattern over a 5/4 time signature

4. I was lucky to have Rush play at my high school a few times 40 years ago (before Neil Peart, but Alex Lifeson had a lifelong effect on my guitar playing)

Cheers,
Mike
_________________
MSA Classic 5+4
Too many 6-strings and amps to list
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP